![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
I would like to hear anyone's ideas about these subjects. Why is it that it seems only a few people around the world are researching them, and why is it mostly hobbyists and independent inventors. Is it supressed tech? Surely antigravity would be the most desirable tech we could possibly develop. Why is not every major university studying this? The Biefeld-Brown effect has been known about since the 20s - how is it possible that we don't have flying cars yet? Any thoughts appreciated. With kindest regards, Shaun |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Shaun Moss:
"Shaun Moss" wrote in message ... Hi I would like to hear anyone's ideas about these subjects. Why is it that it seems only a few people around the world are researching them, Because there is no science there yet. So ony those that feel they can go into a very large area, in the dark, fire a shot from a peashooter, and down the gazelle of "antigravity", do so. and why is it mostly hobbyists and independent inventors. Because the predictive abilities of a science aren't there to say "now do this", "place this here", "apply this much", and "stay out of here". Is it supressed tech? No. What has been tried so far is based on what already is known not to work, or work only over a limited range. Surely antigravity would be the most desirable tech we could possibly develop. Why is not every major university studying this? What do you think is at the heart of the *intense* study of GR and quantum gravity? *Everyone* wants it. The Biefeld-Brown effect has been known about since the 20s - how is it possible that we don't have flying cars yet? You've never been on the freeway in California, I see. David A. Smith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|