|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
April 10th 05, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:26:19 +0100
Jonathan Silverlight wrote: In message , Ray Vingnutte writes Do we wave goodbye to this sort of thing when hubble burns up? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4414481.stm If it burns before its successor is launched, then yes. But the successor to HST (it is completed and launched successfully) is the James Webb Space Telescope, which is specifically aimed at that sort of distant target. What we lose is the wonderful results in visible and especially ultraviolet from objects closer to home. Losing HST is the equivalent of destroying Mount Palomar - only more expensive. Apologies if your question was rhetorical and you already knew that! -- Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. Have you seen this.. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4426535.stm 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stardate 2004-04-06 First Generation of Stars | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | April 9th 04 05:43 PM |
| NGC1647 Open cluster - Help in field testing a draft cluster magnitude chart | PrisNo6 | Amateur Astronomy | 21 | March 22nd 04 01:15 AM |
| Observing Report - December 28, 2003: Horsehead and Much More | Craig Levine | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | December 29th 03 10:36 PM |
| [obs] Lucy looks Skywards 23/09/2003 | Morgoth | UK Astronomy | 1 | September 29th 03 02:39 AM |
| Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 21st 03 06:10 PM |
Threaded Mode