![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DARPA and various companies including Scaled Composites are
looking at a carrier aircraft that would fly to Mach 3.1 and 200,000 feet(!) to deploy a two-stage rocket which would carry up to 50-130 kg into orbit. The rocket itself is not unusual, it's the aircraft. Four souped up F-100 engines being injected with water and LOX, something that might almost embarrass a SR-71. It's this weeks AW&ST cover story. Read it he http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/new...wst_story.jsp? id=news/09223top.xml --Damon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damon Hill writes:
DARPA and various companies including Scaled Composites are looking at a carrier aircraft that would fly to Mach 3.1 and 200,000 feet(!) to deploy a two-stage rocket which would carry up to 50-130 kg into orbit. The rocket itself is not unusual, it's the aircraft. Not to be picky, but 200,000 feet is almost a spacecraft. Or at least an air-breathing first stage of a launcher. Is this thing thought be at Mach 3.1 at 200,000 feet? What it is speed at 50,000 feet? Jochem -- "A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jochem Huhmann wrote in :
Damon Hill writes: DARPA and various companies including Scaled Composites are looking at a carrier aircraft that would fly to Mach 3.1 and 200,000 feet(!) to deploy a two-stage rocket which would carry up to 50-130 kg into orbit. The rocket itself is not unusual, it's the aircraft. Not to be picky, but 200,000 feet is almost a spacecraft. Or at least an air-breathing first stage of a launcher. Is this thing thought be at Mach 3.1 at 200,000 feet? What it is speed at 50,000 feet? Indeed, it is nearly a spacecraft by itself as it's essentially out of the atmosphere at that altitude, hence the modifications to the engines. The article says Mach 3.something at lower altitude and still slightly Machish at peak altitude. --Damon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh yeah, I have seen that one at RLV- news yesterday. Pretty impressive and
so simple, that it could actually work! I really like the idea. Lets see if it really happens until 2005 as predicted. If so, this is IMHO much more impressive and perhaps much more of an advance than NASAs stupid OSP and that with a comparably ridiculously low budget! CU Elmar "Damon Hill" schrieb im Newsbeitrag 32... DARPA and various companies including Scaled Composites are looking at a carrier aircraft that would fly to Mach 3.1 and 200,000 feet(!) to deploy a two-stage rocket which would carry up to 50-130 kg into orbit. The rocket itself is not unusual, it's the aircraft. Four souped up F-100 engines being injected with water and LOX, something that might almost embarrass a SR-71. It's this weeks AW&ST cover story. Read it he http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/new...wst_story.jsp? id=news/09223top.xml --Damon |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gmw" wrote in message . ..
Not to rain on anyone's parade but what does the modifications due to the engine's maintained costs and lifespan? According to the article: "The engines are set to operate within its regular parameters, Carter said, which should be adequate to meet Rascal's performance goals. However, if the vehicle weight increases or other obstacles occur, designers may yet choose to operate the engine at higher performance levels even though that would degrade their durability." Lou Scheffer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |