![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:22:12 GMT, "TangoMan"
wrote: Submitted for your amusement. My voice alone was insufficient to get them to change the FAQ. This is from a leading renewable energy advocacy group's FAQ Try and picture what this would look like ![]() http://solstice.crest.org/solar/sola...solaronthemoon Selected Quotes: Why don't we build a solar plant on the moon and beam the energy back to Earth? . . In addition, with the rotation of the moon and the earth as they are, the transmission cables would quickly become terribly tangled. . . . Furthermore since most industrialized countries experience power losses of about 10% between the generating plant and the customer, which is only at most in the hundreds of kilometers, there is no way the energy would be still coursing through the transmission cables after the 384,400 kilometers it would have to travel from the moon to the earth. Not to mention the noise the takeup reel would make as cable was paid out and reeled in due to the constantly changing Earth-Moon distance. ;-) Was this FAQ posted in April? Chris W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|