NASA JPL Mars Rover Spirit Fossil Life Discovery Coverup!

"OG" wrote:

wrote in message
roups.com...
: They just can't cope with
: the reality that lies just ahead of them.
:
: Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: Only the surface is desiccated.
:
:You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
:Any evidence for this?

Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any. This is evidence
of a conspiracy to cover them up (and, incidentally, proof of their
existence).

[Yes, the preceding is really how conspiracy theorists think.]

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

February 15, 2005

Fred J. McCall wrote:

: They just can't cope with
: the reality that lies just ahead of them.
:
: Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: Only the surface is desiccated.

:You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
:Any evidence for this?

Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any.

The only rational assumption that one can derive
from your statement is that you are not even
bothering to examine the images.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

wrote:
February 15, 2005

Fred J. McCall wrote:


: They just can't cope with
: the reality that lies just ahead of them.
:
: Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: Only the surface is desiccated.


:You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
:Any evidence for this?


Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any.


The only rational assumption that one can derive
from your statement is that you are not even
bothering to examine the images.
Remember, all you've done so far is to post an url with loads
of pictures and asking us to find the one you think has fossils
on it. Why don't you post an URL of *one* picture which has
fossils in it?

Greetings!
Volker

Volker Hetzer wrote in -
online.net:

wrote:

:You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
:Any evidence for this?


Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any.


The only rational assumption that one can derive
from your statement is that you are not even
bothering to examine the images.
Remember, all you've done so far is to post an url with loads
of pictures and asking us to find the one you think has fossils
on it. Why don't you post an URL of *one* picture which has
fossils in it?

The rest of us may not wish to see what Elifritz's head
looks like, let alone his face.

At this point, I've concluded that he's just been trolling
us all along for his own laughs.

--Damon

wrote:

:February 15, 2005
:
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: : They just can't cope with
: : the reality that lies just ahead of them.
: :
: : Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: : Only the surface is desiccated.
:
: :You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
: :Any evidence for this?
:
: Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any.
:
:The only rational assumption that one can derive
:from your statement is that you are not even
:bothering to examine the images.

Or perhaps I'm part of the conspiracy, Tommy?

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

Fred J. McCall ) wrote:
: "OG" wrote:

: wrote in message
: roups.com...
: : They just can't cope with
: : the reality that lies just ahead of them.
: :
: : Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: : Only the surface is desiccated.
: :
: :You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
: :Any evidence for this?

: Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any. This is evidence
: of a conspiracy to cover them up (and, incidentally, proof of their
: existence).

: [Yes, the preceding is really how conspiracy theorists think.]

Takes one to know one, Fred? Maybe you should afix that tinfoil hat of
yours a tad tighter.

Eric

: --
: "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
: territory."
: --G. Behn