NASA JPL Mars Rover Spirit Fossil Life Discovery Coverup!

wrote in message
oups.com...
They just can't cope with
the reality that lies just ahead of them.

Mars is drenched in water and ice.
Only the surface is desiccated.


You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
Any evidence for this?

February 14, 2005

Naaa, they're just totally befuddled geologists.

Look at what is happening, Mars is turning out to
be much wetter than they even imagined when they
started this mission, then they found very little
evidence for water on the plains of Gusev, which
they thought should have been a huge sea at one
time from the orbital imagery, then they get into
the hills and find MASSIVE evidence of water, and
now they have to totally reevaluate what they
wrote up in August, and their whold idea of
emplaced basaltic lava flows for the hills is
dead in the water, so to speak, and everyone
else is coming up with biological theories
for berry formation at Meridiani, credible
extremophile evolutionary developments,
and suddenly they get up over the ridge
and discover themselves in a rock field
of staggering diversity and states of
total water alteration, with numerous
structural anomalies everywhere they look.

They are trying to slow things down to the
geologically slow pace that they are used to,
when the results themselves are spiralling
out of control. P205 off the scale, a model
of impact flow deposition that indicates that
the rocks are old, diverse, and loaded with
water and hydrates, salts, etc, and more rock types
than they can possible analyze, and the prospect
that they will probably wrap up the whole life
on Mars question in the next few weeks, while
they're still planning for missions five years
out. Then there is the problem of life on Mars,
and what it means for their pathetic VSE -
Visiting Space Expensively, that puts a
real wrench in the gears for Man on Mars.

Then, we have a faith based administration.

Finally, when all this blew up in their face,
the rover on the other side of Mars is suddenly
stopped in its tracks, while racing off on a several
kilometer trek, and they dig a hole in the ground
and start taking pictures of patterns of berries,
that if you really start looking at too closely,
you will literally go insane at what you are
seeing patterned out on the ground, at both
sites. We are talking major weirdness here.

You figure it out. I'm just the messenger.

I encourage you to study the photos carefully,
especially the ones that come out in the next
few days, if they are able to negotiate the rocks.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

"OG" wrote:

wrote in message
roups.com...
: They just can't cope with
: the reality that lies just ahead of them.
:
: Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: Only the surface is desiccated.
:
:You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
:Any evidence for this?

Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any. This is evidence
of a conspiracy to cover them up (and, incidentally, proof of their
existence).

[Yes, the preceding is really how conspiracy theorists think.]

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

February 15, 2005

Fred J. McCall wrote:

: They just can't cope with
: the reality that lies just ahead of them.
:
: Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: Only the surface is desiccated.

:You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
:Any evidence for this?

Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any.

The only rational assumption that one can derive
from your statement is that you are not even
bothering to examine the images.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

wrote:
February 15, 2005

Fred J. McCall wrote:


: They just can't cope with
: the reality that lies just ahead of them.
:
: Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: Only the surface is desiccated.


:You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
:Any evidence for this?


Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any.


The only rational assumption that one can derive
from your statement is that you are not even
bothering to examine the images.
Remember, all you've done so far is to post an url with loads
of pictures and asking us to find the one you think has fossils
on it. Why don't you post an URL of *one* picture which has
fossils in it?

Greetings!
Volker

Volker Hetzer wrote in -
online.net:

wrote:

:You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
:Any evidence for this?


Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any.


The only rational assumption that one can derive
from your statement is that you are not even
bothering to examine the images.
Remember, all you've done so far is to post an url with loads
of pictures and asking us to find the one you think has fossils
on it. Why don't you post an URL of *one* picture which has
fossils in it?

The rest of us may not wish to see what Elifritz's head
looks like, let alone his face.

At this point, I've concluded that he's just been trolling
us all along for his own laughs.

--Damon

wrote:

:February 15, 2005
:
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: : They just can't cope with
: : the reality that lies just ahead of them.
: :
: : Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: : Only the surface is desiccated.
:
: :You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
: :Any evidence for this?
:
: Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any.
:
:The only rational assumption that one can derive
:from your statement is that you are not even
:bothering to examine the images.

Or perhaps I'm part of the conspiracy, Tommy?

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

Fred J. McCall ) wrote:
: "OG" wrote:

: wrote in message
: roups.com...
: : They just can't cope with
: : the reality that lies just ahead of them.
: :
: : Mars is drenched in water and ice.
: : Only the surface is desiccated.
: :
: :You keep talking about coverup of fossil discoveries.
: :Any evidence for this?

: Sure. The fact that none of the pictures show any. This is evidence
: of a conspiracy to cover them up (and, incidentally, proof of their
: existence).

: [Yes, the preceding is really how conspiracy theorists think.]

Takes one to know one, Fred? Maybe you should afix that tinfoil hat of
yours a tad tighter.

Eric

: --
: "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
: territory."
: --G. Behn