Apollo One and "Verifiable References"

In article , LaDonna
Wyss writes

What is it with you died-in-the-wool,
loyal-to-the-death types who are willing to sweep people's deaths
under the rug for the sake of your careers and/or reputations?

One could retort with "What is it with you 'died-in-the-wool' Internet
conspiracy theory nutters who deliberately post inflammatory comments
before retiring behind a screen of smoke and mirrors?"

Not all lurkers support you in e-mail.

I have read the posts on this group for several years now, and have
enjoyed the discussions and gentle disagreements that result. It is
clear that the regulars who are presently disagreeing so strongly with
you, know a *great deal* about the subject of manned spaceflight. What
they don't know, they are eager to learn about, when they are given the
chance. The information I have seen them freely provide is annotated
with clearly referenced source material (either via web-sites, books or
government records), so that the rest of us can look it up for ourselves
at leisure later on.

Unfortunately, when it comes to you and your postings about the Apollo 1
tragedy, we haven't seen a shred of verifiable evidence from you to back
up your claims. Without evidence, they are only *your claims*, and I
rather doubt they would stand up in a court of law on either side of the
Atlantic. When push comes to shove, you evade the searching questions
entirely, yet a cursory examination of your postings on this group to
date show that you expend a vast amount of time replying to what could
be considered to be trivialities. Please, either put up or shut up.

Also, in consideration of those of us who live overseas and have to pay
for internet connection call charges by the minute, please *trim your
replies*. I have noticed that you frequently tack three or four lines
onto an eighty-or-ninety line posting. You'll notice I trimmed your
posting above to the piece I was addressing - it's merely simple
Netiquette. Doesn't take much doing and helps people in the process.

--
Graeme Carrott
Membership Secretary/Treasurer, Air North
http://www.airnorth.demon.co.uk/

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:01:45 +0100, Graeme Carrott
wrote:

Not all lurkers support you in e-mail.

....In fact, I think this is one of the few times I can safely say
perhaps all but one or two at the most of the lurkers do *not* support
her in e-mail. So far, the only support she's gotten is from scott,
who's a nutcase, and CT/"Stuff4", who's a worthless troll. This kind
of support is akin to having John Wayne Gacy certifying you as being
safe to leave your kids with and Ted Bundy as your attorney.

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr

OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:01:45 +0100, Graeme Carrott
wrote:

Not all lurkers support you in e-mail.

...In fact, I think this is one of the few times I can safely say
perhaps all but one or two at the most of the lurkers do *not* support
her in e-mail. So far, the only support she's gotten is from scott,
who's a nutcase, and CT/"Stuff4", who's a worthless troll. This kind
of support is akin to having John Wayne Gacy certifying you as being
safe to leave your kids with and Ted Bundy as your attorney.

OM

Mr. Mosley (if that is really who you are; from my search of the
history of this newsgroup it appears no one has ever really verified
it for certain): How is it you THINK you know who my supporters are
via email? Have you obtained a warrant and begun intercepting my
email? Which Scott do you refer to? Why do you think any Scott has
emailed me? What makes you think CT has emailed me? For the record,
NEITHER ONE has emailed me since I started this "conversation" on
Google a couple of weeks ago.
Try again, Oh Wise One.
LaDonna

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
How is it you THINK you know who my supporters are
via email?

Why don't you just tell us?

In article ,
(LaDonna Wyss) wrote:

OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in
message . ..
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:01:45 +0100, Graeme Carrott
wrote:

Not all lurkers support you in e-mail.

...In fact, I think this is one of the few times I can safely say
perhaps all but one or two at the most of the lurkers do *not* support
her in e-mail. So far, the only support she's gotten is from scott,
who's a nutcase, and CT/"Stuff4", who's a worthless troll. This kind
of support is akin to having John Wayne Gacy certifying you as being
safe to leave your kids with and Ted Bundy as your attorney.

OM

Mr. Mosley (if that is really who you are; from my search of the
history of this newsgroup it appears no one has ever really verified
it for certain): How is it you THINK you know who my supporters are
via email? Have you obtained a warrant and begun intercepting my
email? Which Scott do you refer to? Why do you think any Scott has
emailed me? What makes you think CT has emailed me? For the record,
NEITHER ONE has emailed me since I started this "conversation" on
Google a couple of weeks ago.
Try again, Oh Wise One.
LaDonna

Yep, and neither have I, your lies on this point notwithstanding. Given
that you've demonstrated that you'll lie on such a trivial point (e.g.,
me supposedly emailing you), why do you think anyone should take
anything you say as anything *BUT* a lie?

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
Columbia Loss FAQ:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html