![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul wrote: Greetings all, My hiker friend took another trip out to the site yesterday and found some more debris about 1/2 mile away. I didn't get a chance to talk to him before he went, but he took a few more photos which are here, scanned from disposable camera prints : -o http://home.earthlink.net/~jpa_2/ Well that's the underside of the wing, as shown by the projecting flap hinge- now I'm not _sure_ about this, but the aerilon, flap, and panel layout resembles that of a A-5 Vigilante Navy supersonic attack bomber; which is one of the few aircraft that has that fairing on the outside of the wing visible to the right in this photo: http://home.earthlink.net/~jpa_2/pages/item2a.htm Compare http://avionsdechasse.free.fr/chasse...5vigilante.jpg The Vigilante also has landing gear that retracts entirely into the fuselage, as opposed to the fuselage and wings; and this has no visible gear doors on the wing. Now...assuming this _is_ a crashed Vigilante, when the first gizmo you found and photographed may be the Vigilante's one certifiably strange feature...its bomb bay door. The A-5 had a slopping internal tubular bomb bay that ran most of the length of the aircraft from behind the cockpit to the back end where it emerged between the engine nozzles: http://ciel.me.cmu.edu/soji/photo/00...igilante02.jpg Housed in the tubular bomb bay was an atomic weapon hanging on the front end of two fuel drop tanks- once the tank assembly was empty it served to stabilize the bomb as it extended folding fins at its rear end and both the tanks and the attached bomb were ejected backwards out of the plane: http://www.vectorsite.net/ava53.jpg This would neatly explain both the hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders and their insulation blankets; it's hot back there, and these are the means by which the bomb bay door (doors? I'm not sure how exactly it opens...clamshell-like...or retracting up and into the body like a early torpedo tube cap?) opens. The layout of the cylinders suggests upwards and inwards to me. I've contacted a Vigilante website about this, and forwarded the web address for the pictures to it. Pat |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
Housed in the tubular bomb bay was an atomic weapon hanging ... Maybe Paul should have another close look at that debris site... |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat, thanks for doing that research. I'm looking forward to any
further results that come out of that effort with the Vigilante board.. One thing that caught my attention is the relative position of the wing relative to the fuselage - it appears to be close to the middle, but I don't know if the circular bulkhead in the photo matches the outside shape of the aircraft. -Paul On Wed, 26 May 2004 03:58:59 -0500, Pat Flannery wrote: Paul wrote: Greetings all, My hiker friend took another trip out to the site yesterday and found some more debris about 1/2 mile away. I didn't get a chance to talk to him before he went, but he took a few more photos which are here, scanned from disposable camera prints : -o http://home.earthlink.net/~jpa_2/ Well that's the underside of the wing, as shown by the projecting flap hinge- now I'm not _sure_ about this, but the aerilon, flap, and panel layout resembles that of a A-5 Vigilante Navy supersonic attack bomber; which is one of the few aircraft that has that fairing on the outside of the wing visible to the right in this photo: http://home.earthlink.net/~jpa_2/pages/item2a.htm Compare http://avionsdechasse.free.fr/chasse...5vigilante.jpg The Vigilante also has landing gear that retracts entirely into the fuselage, as opposed to the fuselage and wings; and this has no visible gear doors on the wing. Now...assuming this _is_ a crashed Vigilante, when the first gizmo you found and photographed may be the Vigilante's one certifiably strange feature...its bomb bay door. The A-5 had a slopping internal tubular bomb bay that ran most of the length of the aircraft from behind the cockpit to the back end where it emerged between the engine nozzles: http://ciel.me.cmu.edu/soji/photo/00...igilante02.jpg Housed in the tubular bomb bay was an atomic weapon hanging on the front end of two fuel drop tanks- once the tank assembly was empty it served to stabilize the bomb as it extended folding fins at its rear end and both the tanks and the attached bomb were ejected backwards out of the plane: http://www.vectorsite.net/ava53.jpg This would neatly explain both the hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders and their insulation blankets; it's hot back there, and these are the means by which the bomb bay door (doors? I'm not sure how exactly it opens...clamshell-like...or retracting up and into the body like a early torpedo tube cap?) opens. The layout of the cylinders suggests upwards and inwards to me. I've contacted a Vigilante website about this, and forwarded the web address for the pictures to it. Pat |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Harald Kucharek wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: Housed in the tubular bomb bay was an atomic weapon hanging ... Maybe Paul should have another close look at that debris site... If one of those had gone missing, I'm pretty sure that a thorough search would have been done for it. :-) Although IIRC there still is one lost in a swamp down south- but sans its plutonium sphere. Pat |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul wrote: Pat, thanks for doing that research. I'm looking forward to any further results that come out of that effort with the Vigilante board.. Nothing back yet. One thing that caught my attention is the relative position of the wing relative to the fuselage - it appears to be close to the middle, There is fuselage debris other than the wing attachment debris associated with this? If there is quite a bit of it that should make identifying it a piece of cake The Vigilante's wing was mounted quite far back on the fuselage: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Gra...A-5A_3view.gif but I don't know if the circular bulkhead in the photo matches the outside shape of the aircraft. It could be an engine intake duct frame member. Pat |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
Harald Kucharek wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: Housed in the tubular bomb bay was an atomic weapon hanging ... Maybe Paul should have another close look at that debris site... If one of those had gone missing, I'm pretty sure that a thorough search would have been done for it. :-) The Vig also had a 'dummy' bomb/ 'live' fuel tank combo that it carried for day-to-day operations, but IIRC it was not jettisonable. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Derek Lyons wrote: The Vig also had a 'dummy' bomb/ 'live' fuel tank combo that it carried for day-to-day operations, but IIRC it was not jettisonable. They found out the hard way that the bomb itself wasn't very jettisonable... IIRC, during a test one got caught in the aircraft's slipstream and started following the plane around until it reduced its speed enough for the bomb/fuel tank assembly to fall clear...it also had a tendency to slide out the back of the aircraft during catapult launch: http://www.air-navy.com/a3j-usn.htm like a turd from hell. The aircraft promptly got changed into a recon machine. Pat |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about the vertical rudder from an F-8?
See this link for comparison: http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/rf...806230_JPG.jpg the mid-fuselage attachment fits, as does the slight extension in the trailing edge. it also has that bulbous "thingy" close to the tip. it was also found east of San Diego, which would most likely mean a Navy or Marine A/C. Dean Pat Flannery wrote: Oddly enough, that was the first one that popped into my mind also- but if that's the case, then where are the guns? Pat |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Pat Flannery wrote: The Vig also had a 'dummy' bomb/ 'live' fuel tank combo that it carried for day-to-day operations, but IIRC it was not jettisonable... They found out the hard way that the bomb itself wasn't very jettisonable... The aircraft promptly got changed into a recon machine. If memory serves, the bomb-ejection system did *eventually* work, although only after a lot of development grief. The switch to the recon role was because of a more global change: the USN strategic-weapon-delivery mission was transferred from the carrier-based bombers to the missile subs. The carrier-based bombers had to find other roles, and by and large they weren't well-suited to the attack role, so they ended up doing things like recon and EW. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ho! Ho! HUMBUG! | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 14th 04 01:34 PM |
MAN AS OLD AS COAL -- Evidence Galore!! | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 7 | September 4th 04 01:53 PM |
First Columbia debris loaned for research | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 21st 04 10:37 AM |
An Interesting Weekend in the Desert - I FOUND something | Edward Smith | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | March 8th 04 05:25 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |