![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scott Lowther" wrote in message
... "Comments and criticisms"... Uh... Should I criticize your rocket engine? ![]() Go for it. OK... Well... It sounds like a really neat system. The only thing that raises my eyebrows is the part that constricts the nozzle for choosing escape thrust vs. orbital entry thrust... What happens if there's an error and that thing didn't come off? Wouldn't that mean you suddenly have a rocket that delivers too much power, too quickly? Having engine problems on ascent usually means too LITTLE thrust, not too much. I guess having a jettisonable nozzle constriction is a lot less risky and complex than having some way of throttling the engine mechanically, but I'd want to make really sure that the mechanism for attaching/detaching that constrictor piece is really simple and reliable. That's up to other people to build though, right? If I understand this right, it's the novel configuration of the rocket that you and your co-workers have patented, and not actual hardware. Any idea how big this thing would be? Is it a scaleable design? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Capsule for new space initiative | CA Zuke | Technology | 14 | April 9th 04 07:01 AM |
Rover brains? | hrtbreak | Technology | 37 | February 23rd 04 04:01 PM |
"The Hole in NASA's Safety Culture". | James Oberg | Space Shuttle | 17 | July 14th 03 07:40 PM |
I think I got it fixed now. | Terrence Daniels | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 2nd 03 07:53 PM |