![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JRS: In article , seen in
news:sci.space.policy, G EddieA95 posted at Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:00:17 :- and bring the damaged shuttle down remotely? The STS has no remote-landing capability (unlike the Soviet Buran). AIUI, with the present system, the essential manual operations are to deploy the air-data probe, and to lower the landing gear. That does not sound excessively difficult, with training, for one person to do. An empty Shuttle is a thing of little value. One that has landed, even damaged, must be worth of the order of $1B. It should be possible to find a volunteer for the job, by promising a salvage fee of say 10% of value if successful, and a consolation fee of say 10% (paid to his estate) of that if otherwise. -- © John Stockton, Surrey, UK. Turnpike v4.00 MIME. © Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links; some Astro stuff via astro.htm, gravity0.htm; quotes.htm; pascal.htm; &c, &c. No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STS-107 Columbia Joke FAQ - Version 6.66 | Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer | Space Shuttle | 0 | January 30th 04 11:15 AM |
STS-107 Columbia Joke FAQ - Version 6.66 | Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer | Space Station | 0 | January 30th 04 05:01 AM |
Whoever beleives Columbia could have been saved, needs to stop watching movies. | Oval | Space Shuttle | 20 | August 31st 03 12:01 AM |
Could Columbia have been Saved? | Andrew Gray | Technology | 4 | July 15th 03 08:29 PM |
Could Columbia have been Saved? | Bryan Ashcraft | Technology | 0 | July 5th 03 08:23 PM |