![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With all the current hype about Titan and what the initial findings have
been, I can't help but wonder why something durable isn't again sent to Venus. I would think that of all the planets other than ours and Mars, Venus might hold the best chance of finding a living organism. I think of this because I remember a few years back how surprised scientists were that organisms on earth were thriving off sulfur and at the bottom of the sea floor. Venus would have similar environments so I would think it might hold the best chance of finding actual life. Gary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Seven wrote:
With all the current hype about Titan and what the initial findings have been, I can't help but wonder why something durable isn't again sent to Venus. I would think that of all the planets other than ours and Mars, Venus might hold the best chance of finding a living organism. Why would you suspect that a hellish hot and baked dry surface devoid of moisture would even be a chance, let alone a "best chance for finding other life in our solar system. I think of this because I remember a few years back how surprised scientists were that organisms on earth were thriving off sulfur and at the bottom of the sea floor. At least they have liquid water--a necessity for all life as we know it. Venus would have similar environments so I would think it might hold the best chance of finding actual life. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:32:57 GMT, Sam Wormley
wrote: Gary Seven wrote: With all the current hype about Titan and what the initial findings have been, I can't help but wonder why something durable isn't again sent to Venus. I would think that of all the planets other than ours and Mars, Venus might hold the best chance of finding a living organism. Why would you suspect that a hellish hot and baked dry surface devoid of moisture would even be a chance, let alone a "best chance for finding other life in our solar system. I think we'd be better off looking for "pass life" in the solar system instead of current life. Mars would seem to be the best choice. -Rich |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:27:45 GMT, "Gary Seven"
wrote: Venus might hold the best chance of finding a living organism. I think of this because I remember a few years back how surprised scientists were that organisms on earth were thriving off sulfur and at the bottom of the sea floor. Venus would have similar environments so I would think it might hold the best chance of finding actual life. Uh, no. The surface is much too hot and dry for anyone to seriously think it harbors life. There has been some speculation that there may be a zone of the atmosphere at high altitudes (30 miles) that might have temperature and water vapor conditions conducive to bacterial life. http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/space/1616042 --- Michael McCulloch |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cassini Update - December 28, 2004 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 31st 04 12:58 AM |
Space Calendar - July 28, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 04 05:18 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |