![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, I wasn't trying to capture the tail at all last night. It
also appears on wider field shots although quite smeared out and indistinct. A sequence of 35 short exposures has recorded two faint structures leaving the coma. I'll post the widefield shots in a summary page when I find time to process them. http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/comets/...10_35stack.jpg -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was only about to capture a faint tail myself -
http://www.pyroport.com/astro/comets...-05/medium.jpg Tony P www.pyroport.com/astro "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... Actually, I wasn't trying to capture the tail at all last night. It also appears on wider field shots although quite smeared out and indistinct. A sequence of 35 short exposures has recorded two faint structures leaving the coma. I'll post the widefield shots in a summary page when I find time to process them. http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/comets/...10_35stack.jpg -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:34:16 GMT, "Tony Pottrell"
wrote: I was only about to capture a faint tail myself - http://www.pyroport.com/astro/comets...-05/medium.jpg Tony P www.pyroport.com/astro Very nice sir. Why blue? I can get blue by mucking about with the white balance of my 10D. Or is it a level/curve reduction in the red+green? -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Global Projects - http://www.globalobservers.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm, nothing to speak of in my picture either - just a hint if you push the
gamma - and NGC1333 just comes into view! 10 x 30sec, 135mm f/4, SXV-H9, 10 Jan 23:00(ish) http://www.aozc64.dsl.pipex.com/astr...tQ4_050110.jpg Mark Pete Lawrence wrote: Actually, I wasn't trying to capture the tail at all last night. It also appears on wider field shots although quite smeared out and indistinct. A sequence of 35 short exposures has recorded two faint structures leaving the coma. I'll post the widefield shots in a summary page when I find time to process them. http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/comets/...10_35stack.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, trypo it should be Q2 of course!
http://www.aozc64.dsl.pipex.com/astr...tQ2_050110.jpg Mark Crossley wrote: Hmm, nothing to speak of in my picture either - just a hint if you push the gamma - and NGC1333 just comes into view! 10 x 30sec, 135mm f/4, SXV-H9, 10 Jan 23:00(ish) http://www.aozc64.dsl.pipex.com/astr...tQ4_050110.jpg Mark Pete Lawrence wrote: Actually, I wasn't trying to capture the tail at all last night. It also appears on wider field shots although quite smeared out and indistinct. A sequence of 35 short exposures has recorded two faint structures leaving the coma. I'll post the widefield shots in a summary page when I find time to process them. http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/comets/...10_35stack.jpg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure! Thats just the way it came out
![]() that night, processing it out must have removed a lot of the red data. I'll give it another go ![]() T "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:34:16 GMT, "Tony Pottrell" wrote: I was only about to capture a faint tail myself - http://www.pyroport.com/astro/comets...-05/medium.jpg Tony P www.pyroport.com/astro Very nice sir. Why blue? I can get blue by mucking about with the white balance of my 10D. Or is it a level/curve reduction in the red+green? -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Global Projects - http://www.globalobservers.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Important is a Comet"s Tail? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 27 | December 3rd 04 12:38 PM |
CCD Image of NEAT's Tail with Fuzzy Stars? | W. Watson | CCD Imaging | 3 | May 23rd 04 05:46 PM |
CCD Image of NEAT's Tail with Fuzzy Stars? | W. Watson | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | May 21st 04 04:02 PM |
Columbia's Tail | Dave Check | Space Shuttle | 5 | February 22nd 04 12:15 PM |
Comet"s Tail | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 56 | October 18th 03 04:31 PM |