![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks John. An interesting read.
The opinion seems to be to use a nut just below the bottom flange and one on top of the flange to hold the flange/ pier down. This avoids very high tension loads being placed on the bolts (studs) set into the concrete. And also allows accurate levelling of the pier flange and thus the uprightness of the pier. I must say that I have been delighted with the incredible stability of my own all-welded pier. Despite it not having underground foundations. In retrospect I might have made it slightly taller. So that if a floor was placed over the feet (but not touching them) then I would avoid tripping over them in the dark. Easy for me to modify thanks to the facilities and materials available to me. But if I was paying somebody else to do it I would think very hard indeed before finalising any design. Regards Chris.B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Save Dunsink Observatory | Albert White | UK Astronomy | 0 | December 7th 04 09:42 PM |
NASA Awards Chandra X-Ray Observatory Follow-On Contract | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 27th 03 08:57 AM |
NASA Awards Chandra X-Ray Observatory Follow-On Contract | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | August 27th 03 08:57 AM |
NASA Awards Chandra X-Ray Observatory Follow-On Contract | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 27th 03 08:57 AM |
Re. Pier for an observatory | Chris M. | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 4th 03 07:59 PM |