The anti-Meade is amusing

More to the point, they seem to make al sorts of claims about
the design of the scope, yet I doubt any of them have actually
seen one. Let alone have access to the designs. Let's hold
off on the flames until someone has actually had a chance to
use one.

RichA wrote:
Reading some of the wildly speculative posts
about the new Meade RCs here is telling. It
shows that some people just don't know (or care) that Meade,
above all other companies in astronomy has done
more for the hobby than any other, in terms creating
equipment that allowed a massive expansion of
viewing and imaging and did more to increase the
numbers of amateurs than anyone else.
The anti-Meade forces do have different reasons;