![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all a newbie here, so i got a telescope for xmas just a cheapy one so my
question is ive had a really good look at the moon and it looks cool but id like to take alook at some other planets and ive seen saturn next to the moon id really love to seen the rings if possible but im not sure which lens's id need to use, heres what came with the scope. The scope says its focal length is 700m its got a 20mm,12.5mm and a 4mm eye piece and its also got 2 eye piece extensions of 1.5X and 3X Barlow lens. Must say its the best present ive had in a long time, and cheers for any help |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:23:34 +0000, Jonathan Horseman wrote:
ive seen saturn next to the moon id really love to seen the rings if possible but im not sure which lens's id need to use, heres what came with the scope. The scope says its focal length is 700m its got a 20mm,12.5mm and a 4mm eye piece and its also got 2 eye piece extensions of 1.5X and 3X Barlow lens. I've just got in after having 5 minutes without cloud.I've got a similar scope as yours - 700mm, and using the 10mm lens, Saturn and its rings were clearly visible with the 10mm lens.I then went to try it with the 2x barlow lens but cloud intervened again. I thought at first the scope was not focused - the planet looked oval/out of focus, but once the scope had stopped shaking, it was clearly visible as rings separate from the planet - the first time I'd seen them ,so I'm thrilled! I think the trouble with cheap scopes is the poor quality lenses.With the standard 25mm lens, everything looks sharp, with the 10mm the magnification is getting bigger, so aberations in the lens are more apparent.This is most noticable when viewing the moon with the 10mm lens combined with the 2x Barlow lens.With both the 25mm and 10mm on their own, the image is quite good, but once the barlow is added, the viewed image deteriorates badly - so badly that I'm not sure if it would be any good for planet viewing. I think you wont be able to use the 3x barlow for much, but you never know, yours may be better quality than mine, so it could be fine. What do you use for finding planets/stars? I've been using a program called 'Stellarium', which is dead easy to use. See here for details: http://stellarium.free.fr/index.html You can have a look around the sky, see something, then go in and see its name.Ideal for idiots like me who only know the moon by sight! Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. http://www.dvatc.co.uk - Off-road cycling in the North Midlands. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been using a program called 'Stellarium', which is dead easy to ?use.
See here for details: Pocket Stars for thr pocket pc rocks and it's sister version pocket stars PC. www.nomadelectronics.com Jay who writes it is a very nice guy too. Best thing about this software is that it's extremly cheap to register and the demo is fully functional. Check it out. Damian -- Damian Burrin UKRA 1159 Level 2 RSO EARS 1115 http://www.ukrocketry.com http://www.larf-rocketry.co.uk "A.Lee" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:23:34 +0000, Jonathan Horseman wrote: ive seen saturn next to the moon id really love to seen the rings if possible but im not sure which lens's id need to use, heres what came with the scope. The scope says its focal length is 700m its got a 20mm,12.5mm and a 4mm eye piece and its also got 2 eye piece extensions of 1.5X and 3X Barlow lens. I've just got in after having 5 minutes without cloud.I've got a similar scope as yours - 700mm, and using the 10mm lens, Saturn and its rings were clearly visible with the 10mm lens.I then went to try it with the 2x barlow lens but cloud intervened again. I thought at first the scope was not focused - the planet looked oval/out of focus, but once the scope had stopped shaking, it was clearly visible as rings separate from the planet - the first time I'd seen them ,so I'm thrilled! I think the trouble with cheap scopes is the poor quality lenses.With the standard 25mm lens, everything looks sharp, with the 10mm the magnification is getting bigger, so aberations in the lens are more apparent.This is most noticable when viewing the moon with the 10mm lens combined with the 2x Barlow lens.With both the 25mm and 10mm on their own, the image is quite good, but once the barlow is added, the viewed image deteriorates badly - so badly that I'm not sure if it would be any good for planet viewing. I think you wont be able to use the 3x barlow for much, but you never know, yours may be better quality than mine, so it could be fine. What do you use for finding planets/stars? I've been using a program called 'Stellarium', which is dead easy to use. See here for details: http://stellarium.free.fr/index.html You can have a look around the sky, see something, then go in and see its name.Ideal for idiots like me who only know the moon by sight! Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. http://www.dvatc.co.uk - Off-road cycling in the North Midlands. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "A.Lee" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:23:34 +0000, Jonathan Horseman wrote: ive seen saturn next to the moon id really love to seen the rings if possible but im not sure which lens's id need to use, heres what came with the scope. The scope says its focal length is 700m its got a 20mm,12.5mm and a 4mm eye piece and its also got 2 eye piece extensions of 1.5X and 3X Barlow lens. I've just got in after having 5 minutes without cloud.I've got a similar scope as yours - 700mm, and using the 10mm lens, Saturn and its rings were clearly visible with the 10mm lens.I then went to try it with the 2x barlow lens but cloud intervened again. I thought at first the scope was not focused - the planet looked oval/out of focus, but once the scope had stopped shaking, it was clearly visible as rings separate from the planet - the first time I'd seen them ,so I'm thrilled! I think the trouble with cheap scopes is the poor quality lenses.With the standard 25mm lens, everything looks sharp, with the 10mm the magnification is getting bigger, so aberations in the lens are more apparent.This is most noticable when viewing the moon with the 10mm lens combined with the 2x Barlow lens.With both the 25mm and 10mm on their own, the image is quite good, but once the barlow is added, the viewed image deteriorates badly - so badly that I'm not sure if it would be any good for planet viewing. I think you wont be able to use the 3x barlow for much, but you never know, yours may be better quality than mine, so it could be fine. What do you use for finding planets/stars? I've been using a program called 'Stellarium', which is dead easy to use. See here for details: http://stellarium.free.fr/index.html You can have a look around the sky, see something, then go in and see its name.Ideal for idiots like me who only know the moon by sight! Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. http://www.dvatc.co.uk - Off-road cycling in the North Midlands. Ive just been using Starry night Enthusiast 4.5 to get a rough idea on where the planets are, im gonna take a look at the web site you suggested might be more helpful for me. thanx for the replies |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Horseman wrote:
The scope says its focal length is 700m its got a 20mm,12.5mm and a 4mm eye piece and its also got 2 eye piece extensions of 1.5X and 3X Barlow lens. Must say its the best present ive had in a long time, and cheers for any help You can get the actual magnification by dividing the focal length of the telescope by the focal length of the eyepieces. Hence: 700/20 = x35 700/12.5 = x56 700/4 = x175 In addition to that the Barlow lenses will effectively multiply the magnification by their stated amount, so for example the 20mm e/p with the 1.5x Barlow will give you (700/20)*1.5 = x52.5. However, there is an upper limit to the magnification you can use. It's limited by seeing (how steady the air is), by the quality of the various optical components and by a few other things. The limit _tends_ to work out at about 50x per inch of aperture of the telescope. So, if you have an 80mm telescope (3" ish) then you probably don't want to go beyond 50*3, ie 150x. The best way, however, is just to experiment and see what works best because there are always exceptions and they vary from person to person, and telescope to telescope. Most of all - have fun! Jim -- Find me at http://www.ursaminorbeta.co.uk AIM/iChatAV: JCAndrew2 "We deal in the moral equivalent of black holes, where the normal laws of right and wrong break down; beyond those metaphysical event horizons there exist ... special circumstances" - Use Of Weapons |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "A.Lee" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:23:34 +0000, Jonathan Horseman wrote: ive seen saturn next to the moon id really love to seen the rings if possible but im not sure which lens's id need to use, heres what came with the scope. The scope says its focal length is 700m its got a 20mm,12.5mm and a 4mm eye piece and its also got 2 eye piece extensions of 1.5X and 3X Barlow lens. I've just got in after having 5 minutes without cloud.I've got a similar scope as yours - 700mm, and using the 10mm lens, Saturn and its rings were clearly visible with the 10mm lens.I then went to try it with the 2x barlow lens but cloud intervened again. I thought at first the scope was not focused - the planet looked oval/out of focus, but once the scope had stopped shaking, it was clearly visible as rings separate from the planet - the first time I'd seen them ,so I'm thrilled! I think the trouble with cheap scopes is the poor quality lenses.With the standard 25mm lens, everything looks sharp, with the 10mm the magnification is getting bigger, so aberations in the lens are more apparent.This is most noticable when viewing the moon with the 10mm lens combined with the 2x Barlow lens.With both the 25mm and 10mm on their own, the image is quite good, but once the barlow is added, the viewed image deteriorates badly - so badly that I'm not sure if it would be any good for planet viewing. I think you wont be able to use the 3x barlow for much, but you never know, yours may be better quality than mine, so it could be fine. What do you use for finding planets/stars? I've been using a program called 'Stellarium', which is dead easy to use. See here for details: http://stellarium.free.fr/index.html You can have a look around the sky, see something, then go in and see its name.Ideal for idiots like me who only know the moon by sight! Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. http://www.dvatc.co.uk - Off-road cycling in the North Midlands. I like the freeware MicroSky from http://www.upto.org/microsky/ It's a freeware planetarium for java enabled mobile/cell phones. Martin. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestron Telescope Question | Amy Dodd | Amateur Astronomy | 32 | March 29th 04 07:12 PM |
NASA Announces New Name For Space Infrared Telescope Facility | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | December 18th 03 10:59 PM |
NASA Releases Dazzling Images From New Space Telescope | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | December 18th 03 07:02 PM |
Lowell Observatory and Discovery Communications Announce Partnership To Build Innovative Telescope Technology | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 16th 03 06:17 PM |
World's Largest Astronomical CCD Camera Installed On Palomar Observatory Telescope | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 29th 03 08:54 PM |