![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... The BBC is reporting that after the 2006 contract completion, the Russian space agency will only fly US astronauts on a commercial basis. They didn't say whether it is RKS, Energia or other institute saying no, I'm assuming RKS or whatever their called now. This seems like a good opportunity for the America's Space Prize or a "fasttrack" CEV like the t/Space proposal. alternatively an excellent excuse to abandon the station. The simplest, yet most unlikely, near-term solution would seem for Congress to make an exemption for purchasing Soyuz seats. No, by that time the Shuttle will be flying again and the U.S. won't need the Soyuz flights anymore. Also, the U.S. will have something to bargain with (i.e. Russian cosmonauts will also have to pay for a Shuttle flight). Therefore, this entire announceent is futile. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 1104323431.6c9fa693bd47c8e2b74608177df38757@teran ews,
"Henk Boonsma" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... The BBC is reporting that after the 2006 contract completion, the Russian space agency will only fly US astronauts on a commercial basis. They didn't say whether it is RKS, Energia or other institute saying no, I'm assuming RKS or whatever their called now. This seems like a good opportunity for the America's Space Prize or a "fasttrack" CEV like the t/Space proposal. alternatively an excellent excuse to abandon the station. The simplest, yet most unlikely, near-term solution would seem for Congress to make an exemption for purchasing Soyuz seats. No, by that time the Shuttle will be flying again and the U.S. won't need the Soyuz flights anymore. Also, the U.S. will have something to bargain with (i.e. Russian cosmonauts will also have to pay for a Shuttle flight). Therefore, this entire announceent is futile. True, one way or another: either because the Shuttle will be in service, or because another shuttle will have been destroyed and the US will have abandoned ISS participation. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Errr ...how do you propose that a US astronaut return to Earth from ISS
for those periods when Shuttle is not attached to ISS? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Minimum Number of Rocket Designs | Charles Talleyrand | Space Science Misc | 47 | July 14th 04 10:40 PM |
Success of the 1,688th launch of Soyuz | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 26th 04 03:22 PM |
No reports on the news group about the soyuz? Everyone gone on holiday? | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 6 | April 23rd 04 03:25 AM |
Soyuz station flights | Andrew Gray | Space Science Misc | 1 | January 6th 04 12:26 PM |
News: PREPARATIONS FOR BUILDING SOYUZ LAUNCH COMPLEX AT KOUROU CONTINUE | Rusty B | Policy | 0 | August 7th 03 04:21 PM |