![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christopher M. Jones" wrote in message ... Henk Boonsma wrote: "Damon Hill" wrote in message 1... At some point, clustering the existing CBCs gets unwieldy and hits an upper limit in performance; Boeing proposes a new and larger CBC for a next-generation heavy lifter that achieves and exceeds Saturn V class performance. I'm pretty sure that the next Atlas will not rival or exceed the Saturn V as that would require a 500% boost in payload capacity. Boeing does not make the Atlas. Damon is describing a descendent of the Delta IV common core booster which is larger than the current version. Clusters of that larger core could conceivably achieve Saturn V performance, especially considering that configurations using not just 3, but 5 or more common cores have been proposed. Still that does not change the fact that the Delta-IV-H has only 1/5th the load capacity of the Saturn V and will therefore need a five-vold increase in capacitity to match the old Saturn V. I simply don't see them doing that in the next generation (if ever). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Still that does not change the fact that the Delta-IV-H has only 1/5th the
load capacity of the Saturn V and will therefore need a five-vold increase in capacitity to match the old Saturn V. I simply don't see them doing that in the next generation (if ever). So maybe we should build Shuttle Cs if there is no way for the Deltas to do it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tkalbfus1" wrote in message ... Still that does not change the fact that the Delta-IV-H has only 1/5th the load capacity of the Saturn V and will therefore need a five-vold increase in capacitity to match the old Saturn V. I simply don't see them doing that in the next generation (if ever). So maybe we should build Shuttle Cs if there is no way for the Deltas to do it. The load capacity of a Shuttle C still wouldn't match the Saturn V (I think; I reckon it could lift 75 tons in LEO). But the biggest problem is that it would be difficult for for it to include both the CEV, moon lander and needed rocket/fuel module in one package. Also, if something goes wrong, the CEV and the crew are history as they are located on the side of the fuel tank, not on top of it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The load capacity of a Shuttle C still wouldn't match the Saturn V (I think;
I reckon it could lift 75 tons in LEO). But the biggest problem is that it would be difficult for for it to include both the CEV, moon lander and needed rocket/fuel module in one package. Also, if something goes wrong, the CEV and the crew are history as they are located on the side of the fuel tank, not on top of it. They could be launched in tandem, there are two launch pads capable of handling the Shuttle. Launch the Lunar Lander in one and the CEV on another. These two parts dock in low Earth obit and you have a 150 ton vehicle. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Astronomical Observations - Parts 1 & 2 | Fact Finder | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | August 25th 03 03:52 PM |
Astronomical Observations - Parts 1 & 2 | Fact Finder | CCD Imaging | 3 | August 25th 03 03:52 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
NASA artist illustrations and cutaways of Saturn vehicles | Rusty Barton | History | 3 | August 24th 03 10:39 AM |