![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...nd_040222.html BRBR It doesn't discuss whether the Air Force is going to devote the needed money for all these ideas, given the massive ovverruns on existing space projects like SBIRS and the fact that dollars for space compete with dollars for fighter planes. If history is any guide, the answer to that question can be described using the words "snowball" and "hell." Matt Bille ) OPINIONS IN ALL POSTS ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE AUTHOR |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Feb 2004, MattWriter wrote:
http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...nd_040222.html It doesn't discuss whether the Air Force is going to devote the needed money for all these ideas, given the massive ovverruns on existing space projects like SBIRS and the fact that dollars for space compete with dollars for fighter planes. If history is any guide, the answer to that question can be described using the words "snowball" and "hell." The U.S. Air Force's Air Vehicles Directorate is developing a Space Operations Vehicle to serve as the reusable launch vehicle component of the proposed Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) Military Space Plane. The SOV integrated concept is not a specific design concept, but rather a set of capabilities. Desired attributes for the SOV include responsive on-demand launch, high sortie rates, short turnaround times, and aircraft-like systems operability. Indeed, the desire of all space cadets but knowing NASA and affordable access to space program failures the above fantasy bring much laughter. I see no space access technology on the horizon that's even able to replace the dodo shuttles, just a lot of expensive paper shuffling dreaming. Likely it'll take a China man on the moon to stimulate US to make needed strides to space access, like Russia did to get US to go to the moon. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
William Elliot opined
On Wed, 26 Feb 2004, MattWriter wrote: http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...ound_040222.ht ml It doesn't discuss whether the Air Force is going to devote the needed money for all these ideas, given the massive ovverruns on existing space projects like SBIRS and the fact that dollars for space compete with dollars for fighter planes. If history is any guide, the answer to that question can be described using the words "snowball" and "hell." The U.S. Air Force's Air Vehicles Directorate is developing a Space Operations Vehicle to serve as the reusable launch vehicle component of the proposed Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) Military Space Plane. The SOV integrated concept is not a specific design concept, but rather a set of capabilities. Desired attributes for the SOV include responsive on-demand launch, high sortie rates, short turnaround times, and aircraft-like systems operability. Indeed, the desire of all space cadets but knowing NASA and affordable access to space program failures the above fantasy bring much laughter. I see no space access technology on the horizon that's even able to replace the dodo shuttles, just a lot of expensive paper shuffling dreaming. Delta Clipper and Black Horse come to mind. But the DC-X project was run by a handful of people, so what would happen to all those NASA technictions? Likely it'll take a China man on the moon to stimulate US to make needed strides to space access, like Russia did to get US to go to the moon. Would it really? -ash Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |