![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's an article that CNN has about nuclear power on space probes. I
list some questions about it below http://www.space.com/businesstechnol..._focus_040218- 1.html (Note the line wrap on link.) One thing that kind of bothers me is the statement that, "The Energy Department, working with industry, is designing a space-qualified nuclear fission reactor capable of generating 100 kilowatts of power -- about 1,000 times more than most solar-powered space probes have available today." Is it true that the average space probe today only uses about 100 Watts? I'm pretty sure that thin film collectors can produce up to several kilowatts per kilogram of PV panel (at Earth orbit insolation levels) and that fresnels or other concentrators can improve this power to weight ratio further. OTOH, the thermal energy produced by a kg of PU238 is about 500 Watts and a stirling may only allow them to get 30% of that converted into electricity. Furthermore, new technologies are allowing for even lighter weight PV and light weight solar thermal concentrators. I'd think that you'd have to be very far from the sun or doing fairly exotic things before an RTG only approach would be the best or the cheapest. Also, I was wondering about this. It seems to me that rather than using just Stirlings or just thermal diodes that it should be possible to use the Stirling as the primary source and the thermal diodes to top off. The diodes and thermionics are very light weight. They would remove some of the heat that would otherwise be available to the stirling engine, but if they didn't drop the overall temperature inordinately then I would think that they could still produce net power beyond what the Stirling alone could achieve. Modern thermal diodes can actually be quite efficient. But, of course, like I said above, these same technologies could also be used with solar concentrators on many space probes. -- __________________________________________________ ___ Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com) "It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow' disease, and many others, but I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I keep dreaming of the Administration drawing a connection between
nuclear power and space development. I imagine the President having a Reaganesque type speech reminiscent of 'Star Wars' where he draws a parallel between the computer revolution and early work for space and missile research on integrated circuits - and his vision of energy indepdendence for the US in the future with an energy revolution brough about by the present work he has authorized for space nuclear research. A future where we have clean compact inexpensive nuclear reactors are broadly available to cheaply producing hydrogen fuels for hypercars and homes and industry alike. All made possible by today's development of nuclear space power, nuclear thermal rockets, nuclear electric rockets and nuclear pulse rockets with which our generation tames the solar system and creates a world of peace and prosperity for all using the vast resources available throughout the solar system. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
CNN article about nuclear power on space probes | quibbler | Science | 9 | February 28th 04 08:00 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |