A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rules Set for $50 Million 'America's Space Prize'



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old November 23rd 04, 12:24 AM
Michael P. Walsh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Edward Wright" wrote in message
om...
"Michael P. Walsh" wrote in message
...

Now, George, you know that a reusable spacecraft like Bigelow's

asking
for must be terribly, terribly expensive. It's been proven by

numerous
papers on Minimal Cost Design. :-)


Of course it will be. Depending on just how you define
"terribly, terribly expensive".

For me $50 million meets the criteria.

It probably doesn't for either Paul Allen or
Bigelow.


Aw, Mike, I wouldn't've pulled your leg if I thought it would come
off! :-)

I was just razzing George because because of all the times he said
expendables were the only way to go, at least for the next umpteen
decades. :-)


I wasn't intending to be serious, just pointing out that the
term "terribly, terribly expensive" is quite subjective.

Getting more serious, $50 million is an extremely low cost for a
reusable launch vehicle but not necessarily for a resusable capsule.
I don't even think that reusability is necessarily the most expensive
part of a manuverable passenger & cargo carrier. It depends on
how much propulsion capability is required and how complex the
system software/hardware combination is.

If you want to see how expensive it could get check the numbers
on how much Europe is spending on their ISS cargo carrier.

I have been breaking in a new computer and I think I have
finally reached a point where it is helping me get work done
rather than sucking up time to check out the new hardware/software
combination. (Considerably less expensive than a reusable
space vehicle).

Mike Walsh


  #62  
Old December 11th 04, 08:17 PM
Keith F. Lynch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Henry Spencer wrote:
Airliners carry liferafts, in addition to lifejackets. I don't
believe there has ever been a survivable ditching of a major
airliner, so how well they would work is unclear.


I seem to recall that one hijacked jet went down within sight of a
coast, and there were numerous survivors.

Also, a jet went down in the Potomac River due to ice, and there were
a few survivors.
--
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Policy 145 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
Wednesday, Sep 29 -- the first SpaceShipOne flight in a two-part try at the X-Prize. Jim Oberg Policy 0 July 27th 04 10:09 PM
cheap access to space - majority opinion Cameron Dorrough Technology 15 June 27th 04 03:35 AM
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) Rand Simberg Space Science Misc 18 February 14th 04 03:28 AM
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 8 August 31st 03 02:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.