![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Revision wrote:
The cost-benefit ration of the ISS was low and is declining fast. The costs are huge. It was conceived as a work project for a machine that is not operational. Au contraire. The ISS is fully functional, especially with 2 man crew. Don't think of it as some lab that studies crystals all day long. The real research and the real value is to learn to live in space. And to experiment on improving living conditions in space, learning how to work in 0g. There are a LOT of things that they aren't doing but should be doing. Learning how to operate/surgery in 0g for instance. Eventually, studying the effects of 0g on pregnancy/birth and the list goes on. Think long term duration flights to Mars and beyond. Before we can do those, we must develop the systems and the expertise and the ISS is the perfect place to do this. Unless we meet up with Vulcans who give us technology for gravity plating, we will need to learn much more about living in 0g and being able to re-integrate in gravity environments. In fact, the ISS doesn't need a new "lab". It needs a gym where they can test out various exercise equipment. It needs a better equipped kitchen where they can test various cooking techniques for food. The problems with Elektron are far more valuable to humankind's future than looking at crystals grow all day long. Finding out what causes them and how to change the design so they don't occur anymore is critical to designing equipment that will be reliable for a long term mission to Mars and beyond. So anyway it freaks me out that the Progress vehicles get launched, unloaded, and then splashed. But Progress acts as an expensive trash can. If you don't have it, then you need a way to process all your waste material, from dirty towels to human waste to broken down equipment that is being thrown away. Similarly the whole bit with the Soyuz having a six month shelf life is nuts. All the crew needs for emergency egress is a pod with a heat shield that does a ballistic entry like the crew return did accidentally a couple of flights ago. You forgot the de-orbit engine. If all they have is a capsule, the capsule will remain in orbit for a very long time.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Minimum Number of Rocket Designs | Charles Talleyrand | Space Science Misc | 47 | July 14th 04 10:40 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
NASA Selects Explorer Mission Proposals For Feasibility Studies | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 4th 03 10:14 PM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Rusty B | History | 1 | July 19th 03 02:54 AM |
NASA, Carnegie Mellon Inspire Future Robotics Engineers | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 16th 03 10:04 PM |