A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F number



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 22nd 04, 03:30 AM
Mike Ruskai
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:14:16 GMT, Eric wrote:

I'm trying to get my head around how the f number affects things

Can someone fill this in for me?

Given all else remains the same...

low F ---------- vs ----------- hi F


A capital F usually denotes focal length. It seems to me that you're
really asking about focal ratio, as in f/4.5, f/10, etc.

I will assume that's what you mean.

By all else being equal, I mean that the aperture of the telescope and the
quality of the objective are the same. Also the same is the field of full
illumination when talking about an obstructed instrument.

The lower the focal ratio:

1) The higher the magnitude of image aberrations, including spherical
aberration, coma, astigmatism, and chromatic aberration (the latter only
with refractors, of course).

2) The wider the field of view for a given eyepiece, and the lower the
magnification.

3) The less time taken to expose an extended object (planet, nebula,
galaxy, etc.) on film or CCD. Star exposure time depends on aperture
only, and is not affected by focal ratio.

4) The shorter the tube in a refractor or Newtonian (or any other
single-reflection focal system).

5) The larger the central obstruction in a Newtonian. The same is true of
compound systems (SCT, MCT, Cassegrain, etc.) in practice, though it's not
a given (secondary power/position can be changed).

Take the opposite of each item, and that's what you get with a higher
focal ratio.


--
- Mike

Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Archimedes Number - Erratum Ralph Hertle Misc 0 November 7th 04 01:26 AM
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt hermesnines Astronomy Misc 10 February 27th 04 02:14 AM
New Solar System Model that explains DW 2004 / Quaoar / Kuiper Belt and Pluto hermesnines Misc 0 February 24th 04 08:49 PM
Shenzhou has landed Rick DeNatale History 74 October 25th 03 07:23 PM
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 8 August 31st 03 02:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.