![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps the times they are a changing.
I suspect that this question would not be so relevant in another 30 years time perhaps a lot longer. Astronomy has been around many years, and i suspect the volume of people that come into this hobby can be put down to society holding different priorities as well as various kinks in the development of our individual cultures. Climate change would/is have/having a dramatic effect on the observational astronomer. The information age and the speed in which that information is now delivered against the rather leisurely pace of a nights observing is now at odds with today's mindset. Hubble has given today's child a unique view of the cosmos that cannot be matched at the EP (yet) which could lead to faint fuzzes being a somewhat disappointed view to new young observers. On the plus side their are likely thanks too many present amateurs always going to be a core of observers that will pass down there skills from one generation to the next. So far this seems to be enough to counter the movement of people from and into the hobby. Also, I do believe that today's youngsters thanks to the work at NASA and other space agencies as well as the commitment of School teachers (which is one reason, why I would not worry too much about the Wisconsin thing). Couple that with the sheer vast amount of online resources available to today's youngsters. And I think you may end up with a more clued up bunch of misfits that ever walked the planet. We oldies just can't see it yet, but then I am pretty sure my parents couldn't see it either. Barry remove 1nospam2 to reply |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Nov 2004 08:57:38 -0800, Barry Sharpe wrote:
Hubble has given today's child a unique view of the cosmos that cannot be matched at the EP (yet) which could lead to faint fuzzes being a somewhat disappointed view to new young observers. Hmmm, to my way of thinking, a child with a disposition to seek and enjoy Hubble images is highly likely to be sufficiently intelligent and discriminating to realize that an EP view through a backyard scope is not going to compare. -- Martin "Photographs From the Universe of Amateur Astronomy" http://home.earthlink.net/~martinhowell |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:26:44 -0500, RichA wrote:
This is something I can't quite pin down. A few years ago, I noticed that amateurs seemed to be older than they were 20 years ago, on average... I can say that it's true for myself. I'm older now than I was 20 years ago. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote This is something I can't quite pin down. A few years ago, I noticed that amateurs seemed to be older than they were 20 years ago, on average... I can say that it's true for myself. I'm older now than I was 20 years ago. By how much? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Update: "Will amateur radio astronomers be the first to directly detect extrasolar planets?" | Robert Clark | Policy | 0 | October 9th 04 08:58 PM |
AAS annual meeting abstracts of interest to amateur astronomers (long) | PrisNo6 | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | January 11th 04 05:40 PM |
AAS annual meeting abstracts of interest to amateur astronomers (long) | PrisNo6 | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 11th 04 01:09 AM |
The Seeming Demise of the Amateur Astronomer | Greg Dortmond | UK Astronomy | 9 | December 29th 03 11:21 PM |
Amateur astronomer locates powerful stellar explosion before thepros (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 12th 03 10:16 PM |