![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I know, I know- this could turn into a salacious thread, and I'm all for that from time to time but realistically speaking men & women will at some point be spending more and more time in close quarters for extended periods of time, in Space. The recent 'Russian Mars Mission Dry Run -- No Women Allowed' thread resurrected some thoughts concerning this subject, including choosing compatible people, married couple selections, Norplant and other types of contraception, low and zero 'G' conception, fetal development and birth in a weightless environment. Of course if these things could be scheduled the mother would likely want to be on a big ol' rock before she gave birth, but potentially some people would in the future be at all times off planet. So, what to do? There is some concern here about fetal development and children raised without the normal gravity supplied by the Earth's mass. Perhaps centrifugal force from a rotating habitat will serve to simulate gravity. But that is another thread. Another thing besides wee little ones is the social aspect of recreational love making. (Pause for tittering and snickering... OK now?) Being a more of the "glass is on it's way to being filled" type person I would not want to enforce celibacy on Astronauts. In fact there is a '1st' which most likely has been kept from public consumption, (Anyone who has [strictly for example] met Dr. Mae Jemison* in person will agree she has beauty to go along with her smarts), but in all reality while it may have been unlikely as of yet due in part to circumstance- if we give humans enough chances and the right environment they will likely 'get it on' as it were. And this may be a good thing, rather than an automatic problem. Now here we enter into a quagmire of religious, moral, jealously fueled craziness. It would be great to remain rational but this is what passes on the life force to succeeding generations and can't be dismissed for it's disruptive influences and motivations. And too, have we dealt with close quarter, extended period, intimate contact relationships? Full Pheromone Permeation. These things might alter basic physiology, and social dynamics beyond what we can test for ahead of time out in the cool open air back at mission Control. As for me, I hope to get video broadcasts from time to time of smiling happy Astronauts, what they do on their off time is their own business. TBerk *http://www.engr.psu.edu/wep/EngCompSp98/Jemison.gif |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"T" wrote in message
om... I know, I know- this could turn into a salacious thread, Do a search of the sci.space groups for "sex in space" and see how much discussion there has been in recent years. -- Alan Erskine We can get people to the Moon in five years, not the fifteen GWB proposes. Give NASA a real challenge |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Erskine wrote:
"T" wrote in message om... I know, I know- this could turn into a salacious thread, Do a search of the sci.space groups for "sex in space" and see how much discussion there has been in recent years. Um. PK. (Damned Homework...) TBerk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lunar base and space manufacturing books for sale | Martin Bayer | Policy | 0 | May 1st 04 04:57 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Jason Donahue | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | February 1st 04 03:33 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |