A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Permanent Moon Base - Why or Why Not?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 7th 04, 10:55 PM
Kshatriya
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The main driving force for anything as ridiculously expensive as a
moon base will be just a plain old "gold" rush . Only this will
probably be a "Helium" rush.

The Earth is rapidly running out of Helium , to the point that within
100 years you aren't going to see those inflatable baloons in fairs.
The moon on the other hand has huge amounts of Helium-3 , which is the
best material for nuclear fusion.

Also the moon has large almost pure Iron deposits because there never
was any water on the moon . So its the sort of Iron where you spend
next to nothing to get Steel or other exotic Iron alloys from.

Ultimately i think space tourism will provide a driving force , but
the real push towards Solar System exploration will be good old
resource hunting. Once the economics for Huge Carrier class resource
ships works out , we can expect 3-4 year space trips to the asteroid
belt to strip some asteroids off easy to mine rare metals.

Perfect to satisfy both the environmentalists and get a virtually
limitless supply of raw materials .

T wrote in message m...
I'd think it would be important and worth doing.

- Underground for the most part, partly for structural simplicity and
also for protection.

- Sunlight 'up there' is strong and free. Collecting it wouldn't be, at
least not at 1st.

- Potentially harmful experiments (say new types of energy production)
or experiments needing isolation away from Terrestrial sources could be
staged on the back side.

- Lunar based Astronomical Telescopes & other types of detection
equipment. Wouldn't necessarily need to be on the Dark Side, maybe dug
in deep down a long shaft. Freed from lots of Earth based light
pollution as well as atmospheric distortion we might well peer father
and farther back and out into time. Also, things would be a lot easier
to repair/upgrade/maintain.

- New Tech could create trade in the future, well of course things would
be very lop sided for a long time.


And while I am rooting for most all things American I would like to get
the Moon declared (not just on paper) a Weapon & Political Free Zone.
(Yeah, right.) Still, it's at the beginning of things when they can get
off on the right foot.


TBerk

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) Nathan Jones Astronomy Misc 5 July 29th 04 06:14 AM
Apollo Buzz alDredge UK Astronomy 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla UK Astronomy 11 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) Nathan Jones Astronomy Misc 8 February 4th 04 06:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.