A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rutan describes plans for orbital spacecraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 6th 04, 04:19 AM
Neil Halelamien
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rutan describes plans for orbital spacecraft

One-man version of SpaceShipOne may be next stage in development of
space holidays

Pasted from:
http://www.flightinternational.com/f...86036&Code=106

A one-person version of Scaled Composites' SpaceShipOne that reaches an
orbit of 130km (81 miles) to rendezvous with an orbiting hotel may form
the next stage of Burt Rutan's private manned spaceflight plans.

Speaking at a lecture organised by the Manx Festival of Aviation at the
Royal Aeronautical Society in London, the aerospace designer detailed
how such an orbital vehicle could be evolved from his existing
three-man, suborbital 3,000kg (6,600lb) SpaceShipOne. The amount of
spacecraft mass dedicated to fuel would be increased to achieve the
greater altitude and speed required.

"We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in
it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and
for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan.

In his lecture, Rutan referred to plans by Robert Bigelow, founder of
Bigelow Aerospace, to develop a space hotel based on NASA-originated
inflatable habitat technology.

Before Rutan begins work on orbital flight technology, he will attempt
to win the X-Prize, which requires two suborbital flights within two
weeks carrying a mass equivalent to three people. Rutan's first flight
is scheduled for 29 September and his second for 4 October. But before
he flies for the second time, competing Canadian X-Prize team da Vinci
Project is scheduled to try to reach space in its Wild Fire rocket on 2
October.

Another X-Prize team, Space Transportation, saw its Rubicon One rocket
fail a flight test in Washington on 8 August seconds after launch. The
engines of the $20,000 rocket failed after it reached an altitude of
1,000ft (305m). Rubicon One's remains crashed to Earth 61m from its
launch site after its parachute system failed. It was carrying three
dummies representing the pilot and passengers.

  #2  
Old October 6th 04, 04:27 AM
Scott Lowther
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Neil Halelamien wrote:


"We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in
it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and
for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan.



Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy.

  #3  
Old October 6th 04, 04:35 AM
Neil Halelamien
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My suspicion regarding the altitude is that it was either a misquote,
or Rutan mispoke. If I understand correctly, you'd need at least 350km
for a stable orbit.

-- Neil

  #4  
Old October 6th 04, 04:46 AM
Rand Simberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 03:27:16 GMT, in a place far, far away, Scott
Lowther made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:



Neil Halelamien wrote:


"We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in
it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and
for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan.



Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy.


And you'd want a vehicle that could enter at Mach teens, rather than
Mach three...
  #5  
Old October 6th 04, 04:58 AM
Alan Erskine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Neil Halelamien" wrote in message
oups.com...
My suspicion regarding the altitude is that it was either a misquote,
or Rutan mispoke. If I understand correctly, you'd need at least 350km
for a stable orbit.


Probably a misquote on both the size of the vehicle (one person or one
passenger?) as well as the low orbit.


--
Alan Erskine
We can get people to the Moon in five years,
not the fifteen GWB proposes.
Give NASA a real challenge



  #6  
Old October 6th 04, 05:55 AM
Bill Bonde ( ``This is the Battle of Epping Forest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Scott Lowther wrote:

Neil Halelamien wrote:

"We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in
it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and
for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan.


Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy.

For a tourist thing but maybe his design can't get more than one guy
there. It starts with this stuff about needing more people and pretty
soon we have that damn Space Shuttle again.


--
"And he did bring them. It took a number of years, but one by one he
brought them here. Except for his father, that old man died where he was
born." -+ "Elia Kazan, "America, America"
  #7  
Old October 6th 04, 05:56 AM
Bill Bonde ( ``This is the Battle of Epping Forest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Neil Halelamien wrote:

One-man version of SpaceShipOne may be next stage in development of
space holidays



Another X-Prize team, Space Transportation, saw its Rubicon One rocket
fail a flight test in Washington on 8 August seconds after launch. The
engines of the $20,000 rocket failed after it reached an altitude of
1,000ft (305m). Rubicon One's remains crashed to Earth 61m from its
launch site after its parachute system failed. It was carrying three
dummies representing the pilot and passengers.

They patched up Edwards and got him in the debate pretty quickly.



--
"And he did bring them. It took a number of years, but one by one he
brought them here. Except for his father, that old man died where he was
born." -+ "Elia Kazan, "America, America"
  #9  
Old October 6th 04, 04:58 PM
Earl Colby Pottinger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scott Lowther :

Neil Halelamien wrote:


"We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be in
it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and
for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan.


Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy.


Why, electric rockets or tethers can keep the station up, with one man
rockets you have a lot of traffic bring up supplies. At one time most of
China moved on bikes, it did not stop them from getting to work. Start small
and work your way up. The problem with present day NASA is that it always
wants to start big.

Earl Colby Pottinger

--
I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos,
SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to
the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp
  #10  
Old October 6th 04, 05:38 PM
Earl Colby Pottinger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Joe Strout :

In article ,
h (Rand Simberg) wrote:

"We'd have a small cramped cabin for the orbital flight and you'd be

in
it for a long time. You'd want to go to a hotel [because of that] and
for orbital tourism you'd want an altitude of 130km," says Rutan.

Yikes. You'd want higher than that, and you'd want more than one guy.


And you'd want a vehicle that could enter at Mach teens, rather than
Mach three...


I'm sure that Rutan hasn't overlooked the reentry problem.

As for the capacity -- yes, one person seems a bit on the low side. But
it's a start. It couldn't ferry normal people to orbit but it could
perhaps serve to rotate the highly-trained crew of a space station,
perhaps more cheaply than the alternatives. Or, perhaps you could have
the craft flown remotely or via automation, so that it could in fact
carry an untrained passenger. Though I admit that seems unlikely.


Look at the pickle NASA is in now because Shuttle and the ISS. If they had
one man craft that could reach the ISS and return then they could get a lot
more done.

More likely, the plan is to first make a prototype craft in which a
highly trained pilot can reach orbit -- that in itself is a tremendous
achievement! Then to scale it up still further so that it can carry one
or more passengers.


Yes, why build a big monster when you are still testing out your designs.

Earl Colby Pottinger

--
I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos,
SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to
the time?
http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rutan plans commercial tourist spacecraft Joe Strout Policy 21 June 21st 04 05:44 PM
Decision on the Soyuz TMA-4 spacecraft prelaunch processing Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 April 1st 04 01:12 PM
orbit question Jan Philips History 7 September 29th 03 06:16 PM
SMART-1: The First Spacecraft Of The Future Ron Baalke Misc 0 September 22nd 03 04:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.