![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin R. Howell" wrote in message .. . In Rat's post of 9/7/04, he remarked on his observation of the Ring Nebula: snip M57 (of course) - Ring Nebula - PN - LYR - Wow, This is too fun! I noticed a couple of faint stars, coming in and out of view, lying just outside the ring (in addition to the Mag 13 one that I usually see), I am going to check later and see what Mag they were. unsnip On nights of exceptional seeing conditions, why not fully dark adapt your eyes and see just how faint your scope can go? I have posted an image which labels the stars in the immediate area of Messier 57 with their magnitudes on my website. My 12.5 inch dob has revealed the 14.7 magnitude star and using averted vision I can sometimes convince myself that the neighboring 15.3 magnitude star is hinting at its presence. To see the image, go to http://home.earthlink.net/~martinhowell and click on "Other stuff" Martin ....and the central star??? -- Jan Owen To reach me directly, remove the Z, if one appears in my e-mail address... Latitude: 33.662 Longitude: -112.3272 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jan Owen posted:
On nights of exceptional seeing conditions, why not fully dark adapt your eyes and see just how faint your scope can go? I have posted an image which labels the stars in the immediate area of Messier 57 with their magnitudes on my website. My 12.5 inch dob has revealed the 14.7 magnitude star and using averted vision I can sometimes convince myself that the neighboring 15.3 magnitude star is hinting at its presence. To see the image, go to http://home.earthlink.net/~martinhowell and click on "Other stuff" Martin ...and the central star??? -- Jan Owen The Central star is about magnitude 15.0, but it takes high power and *very* stable seeing to pick it up. Seeing variations can make its tiny Airy disk blend into the glow in the interior of the ring. It tends to vanish unless the seeing is rock-solid, and often is observed to 'flash' on and off with seeing variations. I have seen it in a NexStar 9.25GPS, but it was *very* marginal. It should be not terribly difficult in a 12 inch, but again, if the seeing isn't very good, it won't be visible in any aperture. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Knisely" wrote in message news ![]() Jan Owen posted: On nights of exceptional seeing conditions, why not fully dark adapt your eyes and see just how faint your scope can go? I have posted an image which labels the stars in the immediate area of Messier 57 with their magnitudes on my website. My 12.5 inch dob has revealed the 14.7 magnitude star and using averted vision I can sometimes convince myself that the neighboring 15.3 magnitude star is hinting at its presence. To see the image, go to http://home.earthlink.net/~martinhowell and click on "Other stuff" Martin ...and the central star??? -- Jan Owen The Central star is about magnitude 15.0, but it takes high power and *very* stable seeing to pick it up. Seeing variations can make its tiny Airy disk blend into the glow in the interior of the ring. It tends to vanish unless the seeing is rock-solid, and often is observed to 'flash' on and off with seeing variations. I have seen it in a NexStar 9.25GPS, but it was *very* marginal. It should be not terribly difficult in a 12 inch, but again, if the seeing isn't very good, it won't be visible in any aperture. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ Yes, the central star tends to both seeing and aperture dependent. I have seen it in a number of different scopes, but never in anything below 10", and most often above 12.5", so you are doing something right with that SCT. And we do have some decent seeing here in Arizona... But because 12.5" is right at the edge of being able to see it more often, that's why I was curious as to Martin's experiences. He has bracketed it in his other observations, if, again, somewhat marginally, magnitude-wise, so I thought I would ask whether he's seen the central star with the same scope... -- Jan Owen To reach me directly, remove the Z, if one appears in my e-mail address... Latitude: 33.662 Longitude: -112.3272 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:22:35 -0700, Jan Owen wrote:
But because 12.5" is right at the edge of being able to see it more often, that's why I was curious as to Martin's experiences. He has bracketed it in his other observations, if, again, somewhat marginally, magnitude-wise, so I thought I would ask whether he's seen the central star with the same scope... Hi Jan, The central star continues to elude me. There have been a few occasions when I could, if I were less demanding of my observations, claim to have seen the star. . .but truth be told, apparently my timing is off. Clear and moonless skies with really quality seeing conditions are tough to come by up here in Lake Stevens. Reducing the odds even more is the fact that for more than 8 years, I have worked a 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift with an obligatory 2 nights off per week. However, my friend Tom Wales has located a really dark location about 45 miles away and we may go there next week and, if so, I'll give it another shot. Martin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Martin R. Howell wrote: On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:22:35 -0700, Jan Owen wrote: But because 12.5" is right at the edge of being able to see it more often, that's why I was curious as to Martin's experiences. He has bracketed it in his other observations, if, again, somewhat marginally, magnitude-wise, so I thought I would ask whether he's seen the central star with the same scope... Hi Jan, The central star continues to elude me. There have been a few occasions when I could, if I were less demanding of my observations, claim to have seen the star. . .but truth be told, apparently my timing is off. Clear and moonless skies with really quality seeing conditions are tough to come by up here in Lake Stevens. Reducing the odds even more is the fact that for more than 8 years, I have worked a 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift with an obligatory 2 nights off per week. However, my friend Tom Wales has located a really dark location about 45 miles away and we may go there next week and, if so, I'll give it another shot. Martin I've seen it clearly, with direct vision. But, it was through the FPOA's 30" scope... :-) I guess I don't stand a chance with my own 8". :-( - Alex |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scope Reviews and Comparisons | Alan French | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | August 15th 04 12:17 PM |
First Light: 14.5" f/5.4 Newtonian | Axel | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | July 6th 04 06:30 AM |
LX90 First Light (longish) | Andrew Cockburn | UK Astronomy | 46 | May 1st 04 11:36 AM |
$1000..which scope of these three | Ashica67 | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | October 22nd 03 09:35 AM |
New to hobby. Questions about mars..eyepieces..focusing..saturn..gps | Michael A. Covington | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 22nd 03 02:23 PM |