![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phillip Little wrote:
I am considering the purchase of my first quality barlow and would like to better understand my options. Because most of my eyepieces are 1.25" doesn't mean that there won't be times I might want to pop one of my growing collection of 2" eye- pieces in for a look. Is there any loss of light or image quality using a 1.25" eyepiece in a 2" Powermate with adapter as opposed to a 1.25" Power-mate? Are there any astrophotographical implications I might want to consider? No, there is no significant light loss or reduction of image quality in the 2" Powermate over the 1.25 inch model. The only disadvantage is the increased cost of the 2" model. Both units perform very well. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
why is my 2.5x Powermate making views smaller?!? | Seth Waterston | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | March 25th 04 06:58 AM |
2" to 1.25" adapter | Bogdan Tudose | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | July 25th 03 02:26 AM |
2" extension tube was: Long 2" to 1.25" adapter | Joe X | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 10th 03 09:50 PM |