![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Anthony Garcia wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... [snip] It is interesting to compare internal structures with more and less massive stars, all on the main sequence (hydrogen burning). http://www.mhhe.com/physsci/astronom...r19/19f08.html This is wild. In comparing the internal structure of the 0.1 solar mass star vs the 1 solar mass star it is intuitively understandable that the radiative region disappears. HOWEVER I find it completely odd that in comparing the structure of the 60 solar mass star with the 1 solar mass star that the convective region switches with the radiative region. It makes more sense if you consider that massive stars get most of their energy from a different cycle -- the CNO cycle -- which has a much sharper temperature dependence than hydrogen fusion does. It's something like fusion power proportional to T^7 for hydrogen fusion, and more like T^13 for CNO fusion, if my 20-year-ago memories are right. So there's a much steeper temperature gradient in the cores of massive stars, which is what's needed to drive convection. Stuart |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 29th 04 01:49 AM |
Bechtel Nevada: Control of the World's Largest Nuclear Weapons Facilities | * | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 2nd 04 05:29 PM |
disaster warning | Anonymous | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 23rd 04 09:31 PM |
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 20th 03 04:59 PM |