G=EMC^2

"Jochen" wrote in message ...
In article wXJJc.46905$Rf.24781@edtnps84, Matt Williamson
wrote:
Hello, I'm new here and probably missed the explanation, but isn't E
defined as MC^2, therefore would your equation not simplify to G=E^2 ?

Wouldn't that be G=M^2*C^4?

that's equivalent

md wrote:
"Jochen" wrote in message ...

In article wXJJc.46905$Rf.24781@edtnps84, Matt Williamson
wrote:

Hello, I'm new here and probably missed the explanation, but isn't E
defined as MC^2, therefore would your equation not simplify to G=E^2 ?

Wouldn't that be G=M^2*C^4?


that's equivalent




md:

What if ?


If: G=EMC^2, Or, EMC^2=G

C^2=G/EM
C=(G/EM)^.5
However, if graviton waves are photon waves, C=G
C^2=C/EM
C^2/C=1/EM
C=1/EM
G=1/EM
EM=EM

Which means that physical existence disappears, and that only Platonic
numerical identities exist unrelated to physical existence.

The facts of physical reality, however, contradict that, for, the
universe, indeed, is a continuing plurality of physical existents.

Checking premises. either one or the other premises is not true:

Either, C[not=]G,
Or, G[not=]EMC^2.
Or, possibly both are not true.

Ralph Hertle

md wrote:
"Jochen" wrote in message ...

In article wXJJc.46905$Rf.24781@edtnps84, Matt Williamson
wrote:

Hello, I'm new here and probably missed the explanation, but isn't E
defined as MC^2, therefore would your equation not simplify to G=E^2 ?

Wouldn't that be G=M^2*C^4?


that's equivalent




md:

What if ?


If: G=EMC^2, Or, EMC^2=G

C^2=G/EM
C=(G/EM)^.5
However, if graviton waves are photon waves, C=G
C^2=C/EM
C^2/C=1/EM
C=1/EM
G=1/EM
EM=EM

Which means that physical existence disappears, and that only Platonic
numerical identities exist unrelated to physical existence.

The facts of physical reality, however, contradict that, for, the
universe, indeed, is a continuing plurality of physical existents.

Checking premises. either one or the other premises is not true:

Either, C[not=]G,
Or, G[not=]EMC^2.
Or, possibly both are not true.

Ralph Hertle