![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Painius" wrote in message ...
Say "hi" to Rod Serling for me, and i have a sillyass gut feeling that people are underestimating the brightness of our Galaxy Central by several increments. "Sillyass" because there is unfortunately no way to be certain. And i know just as sure as i know how to pound these keys that the hub of the Milky Way Galaxy is bright enough to rival the Sun! I would hope you type better than that Panius :-). No, it wouldn't even come close to rivaling the sun's brightness unless, perhaps, if you were observing the hub from, say, around 1000 light years or so of the center. Even then, the brightness would be spread over a huge area of the sky, so while you would see a *lot* of stars and much of the sky would probably seem to be glowing, it wouldn't quite be like having the sun up. The brightness of the core region can be quite easily calculated based on infrared and radio studies, as well as comparisons with the cores of other similar galaxies like M31. People aren't significantly understimating the brightness by any means. Even without dust in the way, 26,000 light years is a *long* way for light to travel, and the inverse square law really takes its toll here. Clear skies to you. David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Painius That is so very true we can't tell how bright the hub of our
galaxy is. Its a good thing that infrared can go through all that space dust. It does make sense to me that this dust would be thick and flat to go with our frisbee galaxy. Painius what if we did not have this dust shield,and lots of harmfull radiation hit the Earth? Maybe the dust helped to create life on Earth. Having stars inside this hub that have the radiation of millions of suns,and the hub has 100 million stars makes this thinking not to far out. Having a blackhole in the center of the hub must create a lot of angular motion. Bert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Painius Just had this interesting thought. the stars that make up
the hub and have a 2.6 million solar mass blackhole at their center must be revolving around it very fast. How fast is very fast? Lots of stars must be falling through the event horizon every day. Stars of great mass could be colliding(gut feeling thats true) To much stuff and angular motion in a small area can cause choas. Bert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Hi Painius Just had this interesting thought. the stars that make up the hub and have a 2.6 million solar mass blackhole at their center must be revolving around it very fast. How fast is very fast? Lots of stars must be falling through the event horizon every day. Stars of great mass could be colliding(gut feeling thats true) To much stuff and angular motion in a small area can cause choas. Bert Bert, If you have Adobe reader, you may find this http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPa...t_filetype=pdf of interest. (Don't forget the link may get broken by my/your newsreader). DaveL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Astronomers tell us the stars in our galaxy are in lock step. They turn
like the spokes in a wheel. That is true of stars inside the hub. Because of the great gravity of that huge BH they have to revolve around the blackhole so very fast that the gravitation that keeps our sun in lock step with the rest of the galaxy has no effect on stars making up the hub. Not in the books but that is the way I see it. Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My post says inside the hub. It should read outside the hub,and inside
the hub ithe stars are not in lock step Bert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
... My post says inside the hub. It should read outside the hub,and inside the hub ithe stars are not in lock step Bert It's kind of hart to tell what you mean when you use terms like "in lock step", but it sounds like you had it right (sort of) the first time. The bulge exhibits characteristics of solid-body rotation, the disk exhibits characteristics of differential rotation. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message...
... Hi Painius Just had this interesting thought. the stars that make up the hub and have a 2.6 million solar mass blackhole at their center must be revolving around it very fast. How fast is very fast? Lots of stars must be falling through the event horizon every day. Stars of great mass could be colliding(gut feeling thats true) To much stuff and angular motion in a small area can cause choas. Bert I don't think anyone really knows how fast, Bert. I *do* know that most people have some idea that stars are "thick as thieves" at the galaxy hub, but once you get there, it's like the asteroid belt. The stars are far enough apart to mean that collisions are very few and far between. I could be wrong, but i don't think the black hole grows very fast. Here's a neat article... http://www.nature.com/nsu/020107/020107-9.html ....raises LOTS of questions, doesn't it. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Your heart up hanging on the wall Just dripping tears so painfully, You ne'er felt love so true as mine, I want your heart inside me. Protected from all manner, form And shape of harm it will e'er be, If you say no, I fade and die, I need your heart inside me. Paine Ellsworth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Painius Thanks for that site. Seems the Milky Way hub is a very
dynamic place I like our spot in right field a lot better. Bert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message...
... Hi Painius Thanks for that site. Seems the Milky Way hub is a very dynamic place I like our spot in right field a lot better. Bert Welcome! Yes, it appears that for our form of life, i.e. carbon-based, we're all better off being the hicks of the Milky Way! Other possible bases for life might be... silicon germanium tin lead ununquadium This is just a reflection that i perceive from the periodic table of the elements. Carbon-based is probably the toughest form of life. If a carbon-based lifeform cannot live at the hub of the Galaxy, nobody can. I *could* be wrong about this. Ununquadium-based life would be a manufactured form. We're not ready for this, are we. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- a Secret of the Universe... so please don't breathe a word of this-- the Moon above will smile perverse whene'er it sees two lovers kiss; (breathe not a single word of this!) Paine Ellsworth |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glimpse at Early Universe Reveals Surprisingly Mature Galaxies (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 04 01:45 AM |
Faintest Spectra Ever Raise Glaring Question: Why do Galaxies inthe Young Universe Appear so Mature? (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 5th 04 07:39 PM |
Astrophysicists Discover Massive Forming Galaxies in Young GalaxyClusters (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 26th 03 07:57 PM |
New Insight into the Cosmic Renaissance Epoch (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 21st 03 02:10 PM |
Astronomers reveal the first detailed maps of galaxy distributionin the early universe (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 18th 03 12:23 AM |