![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have an ETX-125, and I have an observing buddy who has a Nexstar 5, and I
have a couple of observations: 1. The optics are pretty close to equal. 2. Her tracking is whisper quiet, while my Meade sounds like it is attempting to signal the mother ship. 3. I can loosen the clutches and move my scope manually... she can't. "Graham Shepherd" wrote in message ... Opinions invited, Those of you who have been able to compare, given the choice between a little Meade ( ETX variety ) and a Celestron Nextar 5" , who thinks which is the best buy, and why. Replies very welcome -- Graham W. Shepherd Home phone: 0115 955 9398 ICQ: 71681809 ================================================== =================== Observatory email: Observatory web site: http://sherwood-observatory.org.uk/ Mansfield and Sutton Astronomical Society distribution list mail is now through: ================================================== =================== Astronomy classes for the School of Continuing Education, Univ. of Nottm are held at: Sherwood Observatory, Coxmoor Road Sutton-in-Ashfield, Notts. NG17 5LF, England Telephone 01623 552276 Lat.: 53o 06' 50" Long.:01o 13' 20.7" Altitude above sea Level 187.9 m ================================================== =================== |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've used the Meade LX200 12", Meade LXD55 mount with a Celestron 9.25 on it,
and a Celestron 9.25 on a Celestron CG-5 mount, and I would totally go Celestron all the way. Meade is notorious for mechanical failures and horrible tech support/customer service. Meade does produce good products (eye pieces and other accessories), but for a full package deal I don't recommend them. As for the motor drive noise - hailing the mother ship is a good one! LOL. Before my LXD55 mount fell apart (literally), I had the loudest motors at star parties.. quite embarrassing at times. Kilolani wrote: I have an ETX-125, and I have an observing buddy who has a Nexstar 5, and I have a couple of observations: 1. The optics are pretty close to equal. 2. Her tracking is whisper quiet, while my Meade sounds like it is attempting to signal the mother ship. 3. I can loosen the clutches and move my scope manually... she can't. "Graham Shepherd" wrote in message ... Opinions invited, Those of you who have been able to compare, given the choice between a little Meade ( ETX variety ) and a Celestron Nextar 5" , who thinks which is the best buy, and why. Replies very welcome -- Graham W. Shepherd Home phone: 0115 955 9398 ICQ: 71681809 ================================================== =================== Observatory email: Observatory web site: http://sherwood-observatory.org.uk/ Mansfield and Sutton Astronomical Society distribution list mail is now through: ================================================== =================== Astronomy classes for the School of Continuing Education, Univ. of Nottm are held at: Sherwood Observatory, Coxmoor Road Sutton-in-Ashfield, Notts. NG17 5LF, England Telephone 01623 552276 Lat.: 53o 06' 50" Long.:01o 13' 20.7" Altitude above sea Level 187.9 m ================================================== =================== |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestron settles with Meade | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | July 14th 04 08:48 PM |
Ver. 4 of RTGUI - New Features for Celestron and Meade Scopes | Robert Sheaffer | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 1st 04 07:15 PM |
RTGUI Rel. 4 - New Features for Celestron & Meade Scopes | Robert Sheaffer | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 1st 04 07:13 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |