![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PS Surfer wrote in
m: On my daily walk with my daughter, my thoughts began to wander thinking about building another scope, but the following riddle, so to speak, came to mind. Given two hypothetical scopes, say one 8" diameter, 750mm Focal length (scope A), Scope A Focal Ratio = 750/203 = 3.7 Most eyepieces will not work well with such a fast scope. If the scope is a Newtonian it will also have severe coma. and a 6" diameter 1500mm focal length (Scope B). Scope B Focal Ratio = 1500/152 = 9.9 If you are talking Newtonian, then this scope will have negligable coma and will work well with any eyepiece design. If you take an 4mm focal length eyepiece and place it on scope A, and focus in on say Saturn, then an 8mm focal length eyepiece on scope B and focus in also on Saturn. Given that both of these scopes have equal magnification, and otherwise we will assume them to be of equal quality, and design, which would be the better setup? Scope B. Your scope A is just too fast to work well with most eyepieces. Llanzlan. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moons as Disks, Shadow Transits and Saturn's Divisions | edz | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | March 10th 04 09:57 PM |
effective focal length telescope LX90 magnifier | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 16th 03 02:33 AM |
Surplus Shed 38mm Erfle eyepiece focal length error? | Jon Isaacs | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | November 9th 03 09:09 AM |
Your opinions, please... | LarryG | Amateur Astronomy | 23 | July 28th 03 04:30 AM |
Newbie Eyepieces 101 | BenignVanilla | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | July 21st 03 03:50 PM |