![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not wanting to repeat what's been said on another current thread, i.e. "The
Ranger and the Pronto are no more", has anyone tested the Pronto and TV-76 side by side? We are talking about 6mm additional aperture in the case of the TV-76 and better colour correction, but how does the side-by-side comparison actually fare in practice? I have a Pronto (have had it for years) and have been very impressed with its overall performance. I think I have a good sample - it star tests very well (not that I would expect otherwise). I can see the advantage of the better colour correction of the TV-76 used for imaging, but used visually, is the TV-76 really that better than the Pronto? If so I would be very interested to hear of actual observations where the difference was really noted. Regards, Dave Randell |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Randell" wrote in message ...
Not wanting to repeat what's been said on another current thread, i.e. "The Ranger and the Pronto are no more", has anyone tested the Pronto and TV-76 side by side? We are talking about 6mm additional aperture in the case of the TV-76 and better colour correction, but how does the side-by-side comparison actually fare in practice? I have a Pronto (have had it for years) and have been very impressed with its overall performance. I think I have a good sample - it star tests very well (not that I would expect otherwise). I can see the advantage of the better colour correction of the TV-76 used for imaging, but used visually, is the TV-76 really that better than the Pronto? If so I would be very interested to hear of actual observations where the difference was really noted. Regards, Dave Randell Dave, Yep, I've had them side by side. Over 100x, no question the TV76 pulls easily ahead; not a lot of difference under 100x. Lunar and planetary detail is easier to see and the TV76 really splits doubles well with it's cleaner optics. You might check out Ed Ting's review on Scopereviews.com. I think he has a little blurp about them side by side as well, but can't remember for sure. If I had a Pronto already and were thinking of going up in aperture, I'd opt for the TV85 though. Also, give TeleVue a call. They'll be happy to talk about the differences as they've had them side by side a lot! Clyde p.s. Keep your Pronto, it's a good collectible. I'll hang on to my little Ranger too. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Ranger and the Pronto Are No More | Dave Mitsky | Amateur Astronomy | 180 | August 21st 04 10:38 PM |
Pronto or Takahashi 60? | Tom | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 7th 04 08:11 AM |
Edmund Scientific adopts new polishing method | Richard | Amateur Astronomy | 64 | April 5th 04 02:40 PM |
why an 80 ED? | mick | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | November 26th 03 03:13 PM |
Pronto vs. TV76 vs. TV85 vs. SKY90 vs.? | Jon Isaacs | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | August 8th 03 08:44 PM |