![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Flanders wrote:
"Paul Lawler" wrote in message hlink.net... One thing is to get your doctor to prescribe a pair of "astronomy glasses." The difference between these and your regular prescription is that these are focused at infinity (instead of some closer point as is done normally). Actually, there's good reason to think that astronomy glasses should be focused *beyond* infinity -- that is, they should be overcorrected (for myopic people). For only occasional astronomical use, yes. But for regular daytime use, that's considered by most opticians that I've asked about, bad practice. The myopic eye has a tendency to become "lazy". Give it reason to relax its focusing system and it will stay there. In other words, overcorrect myopia and then you will eventually need an actual correction for the overcorrection. I did this when I was 16. One of my pairs was overcorrected. Soon it was insufficient, and I had to replace it. There is a good chance the increase came as a result of my myopia not having been stabilized yet, but nevertheless I remember having properly adjusted at some point to the overcorrection and then feeling "blinder" when I took my glasses off. The best strategy is to correct *exactly* for what you've got, which is somewhat subjective, anyway, since the ophthalmologist relies on your responses to determine what you see and what not and since myopia often does not stabilize before the entire skull stops growing. A good way to "cheat" a bit on the exam is to claim that you don't see some of the smaller letters until the doc provides you with a lens that will allow you to see slightly more clearly. For those of us with astigmatism, things are even worse: I've spent one hour with my o-doc trying to eliminate side ghosts from the image I was viewing. The results are good for telescope and binocular usage and for relatively dim objects, but I still see ghosts around the moon and around bright nighttime objects when my pupils dilate. It appears that astigmatism can be corrected only under the additional assumption that the iris is not fully dilated. When it is, some astigmatism persists, regardless of correction. - Tony Flanders -- I. N. Galidakis http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/jgal/ ------------------------------------------ Eventually, _everything_ is understandable |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - February 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 27th 04 07:18 PM |
The November 8th Total Eclipse of the Moon (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 28th 03 05:41 PM |
SMART-1 leaves Earth on a long journey to the Moon (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 5 | October 1st 03 09:07 PM |