![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Steinberg" wrote in message ... Jon Isaacs wrote: Here's a nice link: http://antivirus.about.com/cs/macintoshthreats/ What's nice about it? There are no Mac OS X threats (other than clueless PC users, careless programmers and a behemoth in Redmond that can spend many months creating a single critical patch.) None, Jon. No malware of any consequence for OS X. You can put me on that list as well. Lots of reasons to stick with Windows. For me, I still run DOS and Win 3.1 programs under XP. Besides that fact that these programs never existed for the Mac, it is nice that they still run 10 or 15 years later. I'll blow some sunshine your way. Here we agree. Indeed, I still run apps on my Mac that are older than Britney Spears. (For those of you who don't believe that PC programs exist that will do things Macs cannot, try this one: Read Nicolet 4094 data off the Nicolet 5.25in 720K disks with that proprietary Nicolet format. Its a plus that it got the bar dispersion correction built in.....) Haven't tried to do that (doesn't sound like a particularly mainstream issue) but I can and do run Virtual PC on my Macs for just about any PC program that I need, and I would submit that would be true for most/many. Good that the bar dispersion correction is built in, though. Hate to imagine a world where bars were not dispersed. Can you run *any* OS X apps on your Win PC? Nope. Can I run WinXP apps on my Mac? Yup. Frankly, your comment above is tantamount to my saying I can run a Mac-only program and you can't. So what? How fatuous. Surely you can drum up a more cogent argument? Of course, all of this simply glosses over and/or ignores the issue here, and that's the unassailable fact that the Windows PC remains the single greatest threat to the computing universe. Happy you're happy being a part of that particular group, but I know I wouldn't be too quick to crow about it, and I own Windows PCs as well. One, thankfully, running Linux and the other two hobbled by the hideous, balky, virus-prone, bugly, OSes from MS. Just say no, to Windows! -- -John Steinberg email: lid If you do real work on computers then try SolidWorks, Cosmos and Working Model for starters. It wouldn't be too hard to come up with other reasons .... $$$$$ again for starters. I have only had trouble once with viruses and the like and that was years ago (~1989?) before I knew better on how to deal with them. I quickly wised up. Keep your anti-virus software up-to-date, don't open suspicious looking attachments and use a firewall and you'll eliminate 99.9% of the problem. I haven't had that .01% crop up yet in probably 15 years. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Schlyter:
The reason there are relatively few threats to OS X is that it has fairly few users. If it should become a mainstream OS, then it would be just as intensely targeted by virus authors as Windows is today. This is a myth. Are you saying that hackers and virus authors have no interest in attacking people like these http://www.annapolisappleslice.com/who.html? As for "mainstream, I think that Unix is in sufficiently wide use to be considered a mainstream OS. In its various guises it is certainly the target of more attacks than MS OS's. Davoud -- usenet *at* davidillig *dawt* com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 04 May 2004 20:16:34 GMT, John Steinberg
wrote: ...but like a US president who believes in the literal word of the bible, that dog just won't hunt. No worse than a user that behaves like an evangelical about his computer choice. In fact, some might find the former more tolerable. ;-) --- Michael McCulloch |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon Isaacs wrote:
You recommended that we XP users switch to OS-X. I am just pointing out that for me to do so would be foolish, I couldn't run the apps I need to run. Jon Hi Jon--What apps do you need? Perhaps I can help. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Schlyter wrote:
In article , John Steinberg wrote: Jon Isaacs wrote: Here's a nice link: http://antivirus.about.com/cs/macintoshthreats/ What's nice about it? There are no Mac OS X threats (other than clueless PC users, careless programmers and a behemoth in Redmond that can spend many months creating a single critical patch.) None, Jon. No malware of any consequence for OS X. People who are religious zealots about their favourite computers are amusing -- up to a point.... The reason there are relatively few threats to OS X is that it has fairly few users. If it should become a mainstream OS, then it would be just as intensely targeted by virus authors as Windows is today. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/ http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/ Hi Paul--There is the implied assumption that Linux, Unix and Mac OS X have just as many vulnerabilities as NT and Windows.... I'm not sure that that is the case. Granted all operating systems have vulnerabilities, but I'd like to see some statistics that show the others are no better than Microsoft. I've been in the UNIX/Linux/OS X environment since 1989... have been part of the cyber wars... I seem much more secure than my Microsoft colleagues and friends. -Sam |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Steinberg" wrote BTW, very Marty here in NY today as well. Here, it's Marty and hot. The forecast is for hot, hot, and more hot... with gradual cooling sometime in October. GET ME OUT OF HERE! And for H. X. Lester the Eldest, may I suggest you update your antivirus software, do a complete HD reformatting and then contact me for an excellent locale to purchase your new Mac computer. Phhft! 'sides, my McAfee auntie-software 'checked' it. (McAfee: the Leader in Anti-Virus since eighteen-eighty one.) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Steinberg" wrote... [quite a bit] Whoa! Take a pill and chill, John. I am NOT anti-Mac, nor pro-Windows for that matter. I frankly don't give a damn which OS anyone else uses!!! I was simply pointing out to Sam that getting a Mac does not necessarily mean getting away from Bill Gates, that is all. It's good to hear there are better Apple alternatives. I have no dog in this fight. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Oh yeah, one more thing: I don't run any of that software I listed, and nor do I endorse any of it, save for IE. Using Windows does not make me a fan of Microsoft or Bill Gates. You got that, John??? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Steinberg" wrote Ho Chi Minh Lester wrote: Ahhhh! Here, it's Marty and hot. The forecast is for hot, hot, and more hot... with gradual cooling sometime in October. GET ME OUT OF HERE! I've already contacted several northeast state agencies - you've been banished from all. SORRY! HEY! Tell them I'll bring Martyshine and good seeing! I do have a nice little cottage in Death Valley available, Beautyful... Is it worse than So. Cal. there? Good grief. My sympathies to you and anyone else caught up in that hellish mess. 95 here now, 10% humidity. Dry heat my ass. It's about 60 F. right now and tonight it's going down to 40 F. Good thing you sent me those flannel Ed Kranepool pajamas last year. You're welcome. I forget - where is the numeral 7 plastered on those things - the back flap of the pants, or the front flap? I have the Little Al Jackson jammies -- made in Waco, Texas on Christmas Day. Howard "Batter Up!" Lester |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Steinberg wrote: No doubt, but as H. L. Mencken suggested "nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public" either. At least with the Commander in Chief (Shrub not Cheney - allegedly) I can still maintain some hope that come November he'll be gone. Unlike MS, alas. John, You know you're one of my favorite personalities on SAA, maybe even my VERY favorite. Even when you occasionally get off-topic, such as your articulate defense (rants, even) of the Mac, I find myself saying 'Grrrr.... you go, John!' But, if you want to see George W. Bush gone in November, I figure you got about another month to find a viable candidate. John Kerry ain't it, coming across as both arrogant and aloof. And mark my words, his Vietnam experience is gonna come back and bite him in the ass. A real shame, too, because the Dems had a couple of men in the running that certainly might have gotten my vote. Starry Skies, Rich |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected -- Warning Condition: Onset | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | December 10th 03 02:13 AM |
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 7 or greater expected -- Warning | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | October 29th 03 10:25 PM |
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected -- Warning Condition: Onset | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 29th 03 06:12 AM |
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected -- Warning Condition:Persistence | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 25th 03 03:56 AM |
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 5 expected -- Warning Condition: Onset | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 20th 03 01:57 AM |