![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the "groove" is a spiral. Other than that ...
just like a vinyl ep steve(vote for me2020!) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/whyweig...mtbrand=AOL_US "music is like this porthole into another world... the world of truth."- trey Stick it to the man in 2004, wait? who's the green candidate in 2004? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-O-
is the needle, our minds are the wires and speakers 1. The Rate of Expansion will increase as the Universe expands. I'm going to make an assumption here and say that at some point in time the rate of expansion will slow down. WHy? In my uneducated mind it simply seems logical that the "momentum" from the big bang that allowed the universe to beggin expanding will one day stop, reverse and the universe will fall in on itself. I've read that many people do not accept this because the cannot imagine causality working backwords, ie a point were the firsts cause becomes the last cause. Also it would violate the 2 law of thermodynamics, it'd be chaos approaching order. But like you said how infinity is just a concept do to our point of reference (ie we exist in a state were time moves forward and never backwards) so are all the laws we have constructd to explain the universe's birth and growth. How can we observe the univerese's death? I believe that it is something that could be estimated by calculating the amount of dark matter and dark energy out there ( not a simple task) and comparing it to the amount of light matter and energy we have. Something in my instincts tells me that the ration of dark and lighyt matter is key to understanding the rate of expansion (your first postulates says that hubbles constant isn't constant and I agree with that.) Or maybe by observing tachyons (yeah another kook idea) we would have a better understanding of reverse causality. 2. The UGC or CC will vary at the rate of expansion. true but I still believe that the rate of expansion is at the same time another universes rate of compression (duality, like how every particle of matter has a particle of anitmatter.) and then as that universe is compressed into the qp you mentioned (the singularity from which the universe expanded.) our universe will lose it's expansion and then that other universe is reborn while ours dies (it's like cosmic reincarnation.) steve(vote for me2020!) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/whyweig...mtbrand=AOL_US "music is like this porthole into another world... the world of truth."- trey Stick it to the man in 2004, wait? who's the green candidate in 2004? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-O-
is the needle, our minds are the wires and speakers 1. The Rate of Expansion will increase as the Universe expands. I'm going to make an assumption here and say that at some point in time the rate of expansion will slow down. WHy? In my uneducated mind it simply seems logical that the "momentum" from the big bang that allowed the universe to beggin expanding will one day stop, reverse and the universe will fall in on itself. I've read that many people do not accept this because the cannot imagine causality working backwords, ie a point were the firsts cause becomes the last cause. Also it would violate the 2 law of thermodynamics, it'd be chaos approaching order. But like you said how infinity is just a concept do to our point of reference (ie we exist in a state were time moves forward and never backwards) so are all the laws we have constructd to explain the universe's birth and growth. How can we observe the univerese's death? I believe that it is something that could be estimated by calculating the amount of dark matter and dark energy out there ( not a simple task) and comparing it to the amount of light matter and energy we have. Something in my instincts tells me that the ration of dark and lighyt matter is key to understanding the rate of expansion (your first postulates says that hubbles constant isn't constant and I agree with that.) Or maybe by observing tachyons (yeah another kook idea) we would have a better understanding of reverse causality. 2. The UGC or CC will vary at the rate of expansion. true but I still believe that the rate of expansion is at the same time another universes rate of compression (duality, like how every particle of matter has a particle of anitmatter.) and then as that universe is compressed into the qp you mentioned (the singularity from which the universe expanded.) our universe will lose it's expansion and then that other universe is reborn while ours dies (it's like cosmic reincarnation.) steve(vote for me2020!) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/whyweig...mtbrand=AOL_US "music is like this porthole into another world... the world of truth."- trey Stick it to the man in 2004, wait? who's the green candidate in 2004? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3. The Value of C in a vacuum will vary at the rate of expansion.
true 4. The Value of C will vary in a local close grouping of Particles ( Medium) true 5. The Value of G will vary locally with separation distance of local matter. true 6. All particles that display the aspect of duality are only EM waves sampled in a short time frame by a method and design that is intrinsically biased. could you imagine particles displaying aspects or triality, and quadality etc. etc. like how brahma vishnu and siva create sustain and destroy? vs. the concept of the divine feminine and the divine masculine "mating" and giving birth? 7. The concepts of infinity and paradox are illusions created when existing rules fail due to scale or incompleteness. right, space is not infinite more than 4 dim to define any point in the universe. the mathematicians are going to love that I look for anyone to debate my view in detail and destroy it by showing me where I deviate from the existing theory to a point my postulate fails. I obviously haven't done that steve(vote for me2020!) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/whyweig...mtbrand=AOL_US "music is like this porthole into another world... the world of truth."- trey Stick it to the man in 2004, wait? who's the green candidate in 2004? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3. The Value of C in a vacuum will vary at the rate of expansion.
true 4. The Value of C will vary in a local close grouping of Particles ( Medium) true 5. The Value of G will vary locally with separation distance of local matter. true 6. All particles that display the aspect of duality are only EM waves sampled in a short time frame by a method and design that is intrinsically biased. could you imagine particles displaying aspects or triality, and quadality etc. etc. like how brahma vishnu and siva create sustain and destroy? vs. the concept of the divine feminine and the divine masculine "mating" and giving birth? 7. The concepts of infinity and paradox are illusions created when existing rules fail due to scale or incompleteness. right, space is not infinite more than 4 dim to define any point in the universe. the mathematicians are going to love that I look for anyone to debate my view in detail and destroy it by showing me where I deviate from the existing theory to a point my postulate fails. I obviously haven't done that steve(vote for me2020!) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/whyweig...mtbrand=AOL_US "music is like this porthole into another world... the world of truth."- trey Stick it to the man in 2004, wait? who's the green candidate in 2004? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , bug
writes -O- is the needle, our minds are the wires and speakers 1. The Rate of Expansion will increase as the Universe expands. I'm going to make an assumption here and say that at some point in time the rate of expansion will slow down. WHy? In my uneducated mind it simply seems logical that the "momentum" from the big bang that allowed the universe to beggin expanding will one day stop, reverse and the universe will fall in on itself. I've read that many people do not accept this because the cannot imagine causality working backwords, ie a point were the firsts cause becomes the last cause. Also it would violate the 2 law of thermodynamics, it'd be chaos approaching order. I'm fairly sure that the reason it isn't accepted at present (and it was considered possible fairly recently) is that observational evidence shows that it won't happen. Even before the concept of dark energy was proposed it was known that there isn't enough matter in the universe to make it "closed". If we are lucky and careful, we really can live for ever! -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , bug
writes -O- is the needle, our minds are the wires and speakers 1. The Rate of Expansion will increase as the Universe expands. I'm going to make an assumption here and say that at some point in time the rate of expansion will slow down. WHy? In my uneducated mind it simply seems logical that the "momentum" from the big bang that allowed the universe to beggin expanding will one day stop, reverse and the universe will fall in on itself. I've read that many people do not accept this because the cannot imagine causality working backwords, ie a point were the firsts cause becomes the last cause. Also it would violate the 2 law of thermodynamics, it'd be chaos approaching order. I'm fairly sure that the reason it isn't accepted at present (and it was considered possible fairly recently) is that observational evidence shows that it won't happen. Even before the concept of dark energy was proposed it was known that there isn't enough matter in the universe to make it "closed". If we are lucky and careful, we really can live for ever! -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bug" wrote in message ... -O- is the needle, our minds are the wires and speakers 1. The Rate of Expansion will increase as the Universe expands. I'm going to make an assumption here and say that at some point in time the rate of expansion will slow down. WHy? In my uneducated mind it simply seems logical that the "momentum" from the big bang that allowed the universe to beggin expanding will one day stop, reverse and the universe will fall in on itself. I would agree with that except for the premise of my postulate in that the Quantum state acts as a Inverse tensor field... This means that as the universe expands the UGC or The base gravitational constant of the universe is reduced. So using my view the rate of expansion will continue to increase even as its applied kinetic form is dissipated through entropy. I've read that many people do not accept this because the cannot imagine causality working backwords, ie a point were the firsts cause becomes the last cause. Also it would violate the 2 law of thermodynamics, it'd be chaos approaching order. But like you said how infinity is just a concept do to our point of reference (ie we exist in a state were time moves forward and never backwards) so are all the laws we have constructd to explain the universe's birth and growth. How can we observe the univerese's death? I believe that it is something that could be estimated by calculating the amount of dark matter and dark energy out there ( not a simple task) and comparing it to the amount of light matter and energy we have. Something in my instincts tells me that the ration of dark and lighyt matter is key to understanding the rate of expansion (your first postulates says that hubbles constant isn't constant and I agree with that.) Or maybe by observing tachyons (yeah another kook idea) we would have a better understanding of reverse causality. 2. The UGC or CC will vary at the rate of expansion. true but I still believe that the rate of expansion is at the same time another universes rate of compression (duality, like how every particle of matter has a particle of anitmatter.) and then as that universe is compressed into the qp you mentioned (the singularity from which the universe expanded.) our universe will lose it's expansion and then that other universe is reborn while ours dies (it's like cosmic reincarnation.) steve(vote for me2020!) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/whyweig...mtbrand=AOL_US "music is like this porthole into another world... the world of truth."- trey Stick it to the man in 2004, wait? who's the green candidate in 2004? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bug" wrote in message ... -O- is the needle, our minds are the wires and speakers 1. The Rate of Expansion will increase as the Universe expands. I'm going to make an assumption here and say that at some point in time the rate of expansion will slow down. WHy? In my uneducated mind it simply seems logical that the "momentum" from the big bang that allowed the universe to beggin expanding will one day stop, reverse and the universe will fall in on itself. I would agree with that except for the premise of my postulate in that the Quantum state acts as a Inverse tensor field... This means that as the universe expands the UGC or The base gravitational constant of the universe is reduced. So using my view the rate of expansion will continue to increase even as its applied kinetic form is dissipated through entropy. I've read that many people do not accept this because the cannot imagine causality working backwords, ie a point were the firsts cause becomes the last cause. Also it would violate the 2 law of thermodynamics, it'd be chaos approaching order. But like you said how infinity is just a concept do to our point of reference (ie we exist in a state were time moves forward and never backwards) so are all the laws we have constructd to explain the universe's birth and growth. How can we observe the univerese's death? I believe that it is something that could be estimated by calculating the amount of dark matter and dark energy out there ( not a simple task) and comparing it to the amount of light matter and energy we have. Something in my instincts tells me that the ration of dark and lighyt matter is key to understanding the rate of expansion (your first postulates says that hubbles constant isn't constant and I agree with that.) Or maybe by observing tachyons (yeah another kook idea) we would have a better understanding of reverse causality. 2. The UGC or CC will vary at the rate of expansion. true but I still believe that the rate of expansion is at the same time another universes rate of compression (duality, like how every particle of matter has a particle of anitmatter.) and then as that universe is compressed into the qp you mentioned (the singularity from which the universe expanded.) our universe will lose it's expansion and then that other universe is reborn while ours dies (it's like cosmic reincarnation.) steve(vote for me2020!) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/whyweig...mtbrand=AOL_US "music is like this porthole into another world... the world of truth."- trey Stick it to the man in 2004, wait? who's the green candidate in 2004? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would agree with that except for the premise of my postulate in
that the Quantum state acts as a Inverse tensor field... This means that as the universe expands the UGC or The base gravitational constant of the universe is reduced. ah steve(vote for me2020!) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/whyweig...mtbrand=AOL_US "music is like this porthole into another world... the world of truth."- trey Stick it to the man in 2004, wait? who's the green candidate in 2004? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|