![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kilolani wrote:
Interestingly I have the same experience, in that [the Helix nebula] is much easier for me to find in binoculars than any other way. Although it seems that both (or should I say all three, counting Caroline) Herschels missed it, so I assume it's because they weren't expecting anything quite so large... or its size and surface brightness make it relatively tricky in large scopes. Size was probably the deciding issue. Sir William Herschel's 18.7-inch telescope typically operated at 157X, which produced a 15' diameter true field of view. The Helix (NGC 7293) is about 16' in diameter. Regards, Bill Ferris "Cosmic Voyage: The Online Resource for Amateur Astronomers" URL: http://www.cosmic-voyage.net ============= Email: Remove "ic" from .comic above to respond |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6" achro or 8" newt for DSO's? | RKroeppler | Amateur Astronomy | 40 | April 5th 04 01:58 PM |
NGC1647 Open cluster - Help in field testing a draft cluster magnitude chart | PrisNo6 | Amateur Astronomy | 21 | March 22nd 04 01:15 AM |
Obs report, 29 Aug 2003: Mars and a few DSOs | Brian L. Rachford | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 1st 03 01:37 PM |