![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It can appear greenish. Part of this is the human eye response. If enough
photons hit the eye to activate the color receptors, the eye is tuned to see greens better than reds. Also, I've heard where many people perceive some shades of grey as greenish, but this is hearsay. Remember that if hydrogen is the predominant light emitter, and if it is excited enough, you will get the three visible wavelength color lines being produced; red, green, and blue. Due to the way the eye responds to colors when the lighting is bright enough, your eye will favor seeing greenish shades. I've also seen this effect in a lot of diffuse nebula images with my single-shot color camera, whose CCD has a spectral response that mimics the eye's. Through a 60-inch Cassegrain, I've seen shade of just about every color in the Orion nebula except perhaps purple, but even there the colors were not bold, but shades of colors, more like pastels. --- Dave "Mark De Smet" wrote in message ... I recently got an orion XT10 IS, and although I have not had a chance to get to a dark site, I did have a chance to take a peek at the orion nebula from my porch. Having only seen it before in lower quality and much smaller apperature scopes, it always appeared as a grey fuzzy. From my highly light polluted porch (chicago suburbs), the nebula appears very clearly green. (I am not using any filters) None of the pictures I have seen show it as green. Is this the real color? (visible wavelengths) Or perhaps is it that my eye is just more sensitive to green and not getting enough light to see the other parts of the spectrum? Or possibly just a funny result of light pollution? Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Nakamoto wrote:
Remember that if hydrogen is the predominant light emitter, and if it is excited enough, you will get the three visible wavelength color lines being produced; red, green, and blue. However, the stronger emission lines which help in making M42 look bluish-green are probably the [OIII] pair at 4959 and 5007 Angstroms. The one at 5007 is about 3.4 times as strong as the H-Beta line, not to mention being closer to the visual peak sensitiviy of the human eye. The H-Beta line contributes as well, but for the more greenish cast, the Oxygen lines tend to be quite important. Indeed, I greatly prefer the use of the OIII filter on M42 over the H-beta filter, as it shows a larger area of nebulosity (I like the UHC view the best however, as it takes in all three lines). Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Knisely" wrote in message
.. . David Nakamoto wrote: Remember that if hydrogen is the predominant light emitter, and if it is excited enough, you will get the three visible wavelength color lines being produced; red, green, and blue. However, the stronger emission lines which help in making M42 look bluish-green are probably the [OIII] pair at 4959 and 5007 Angstroms. The one at 5007 is about 3.4 times as strong as the H-Beta line, not to mention being closer to the visual peak sensitiviy of the human eye. The H-Beta line contributes as well, but for the more greenish cast, the Oxygen lines tend to be quite important. Indeed, I greatly prefer the use of the OIII filter on M42 over the H-beta filter, as it shows a larger area of nebulosity (I like the UHC view the best however, as it takes in all three lines). Clear skies to you. Didn't know Oxygen was so prevalent, spectrum-wise , in M42. I'd of thought that this was more commonly found in planetary nebula. Live and learn. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Nakamoto wrote:
Didn't know Oxygen was so prevalent, spectrum-wise , in M42. I'd of thought that this was more commonly found in planetary nebula. Live and learn. I didn't know the Oxygen lines were quite this strong either until I was doing a little research for a talk I was doing on nebula filters and picked up "THE COLOURS OF THE STARS" by David Malin and Paul Murdin. P. 97 had the relative intensities of bright spectral lines and showed that the forbidden [OIII] doublet was quite strong. In most planetary nebulae, they are even stronger, with the 4959 Angstrom line often being three times the brightness of the H-Beta line and the 5007 Angstrom line often being *eight* times as strong as H-Beta. There are a few exceptions to this (NGC 40 and Campbell's Hydrogen Star for a couple of examples), but by in large, the OIII lines really shine out in emission nebulae. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Satellites thru the Orion Nebula | Astro-Geek | Amateur Astronomy | 33 | January 23rd 04 03:05 AM |
Whats in the sky today | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | July 14th 03 04:24 AM |