![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:37:41 GMT, Bruce Palmer
wrote: John F. Carr wrote: In article , Bruce Palmer wrote: David Ball wrote: I was just reading http://space.com/news/okeefe_shuttle_040212.html and it looks like they might miss the fall 2004 time frame and end up launching in January 2005. Considering the history of problems with January launches, does anyone find this idea discouraging? The January thing is a coincidence, nothing more. Challenger was weather-related. Did January weather affect foam shedding on Columbia's tank? Not according to the CAIB report. Nor was the Apollo 1 fire due to January weather. A sad coincidence, nothing more. -- Michael R. Grabois # http://chili.cjb.net # http://wizardimps.blogspot.com "People say losing builds character. That's the stupidest thing I ever heard. All losing does is suck. " -- Charles Barkley, 9/29/96 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |
NEWS: NASA Targets March Launch for Space Shuttle - Reuters | Rusty B | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 8th 03 09:52 PM |
Challenger/Columbia, here is your chance to gain a new convert! | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 38 | September 5th 03 07:48 PM |
Columbia Accident Investigation Board Issues Preliminary Recommendation Four: Launch and Ascent Imaging | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 1st 03 06:45 PM |