![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce Kille" wrote in news:xx9Tb.14283$Vg3.1349
@bignews5.bellsouth.net: With or without any future service the Hubble will some day go offline. There have been a lot of ideas floating around as to what to do then. I was wondering if it could be possible to boost it to a LaGrange Point, rather than de-orbit it? Is an earth-moon point stable? In theory, the L4/L5 points are stable, but in the Earth/moon system, all five points are unstable due to the eccentricity of the moon's orbit and the influence of the sun. I know the earth-sun point can be used as the SOHO satellite is there, but it would require a lot more fuel to reach. Not *a lot* more - both require a delta-V near escape velocity, or around 3 km/s. The problem with putting HST outside low Earth orbit is that its pointing system relies on geomagnetic torquers to desaturate its reaction wheels. Move HST out of the Earth's magnetic field, and you've got to find some other way to do that. Also, HST's comm system relies on TDRS, and accessing TDRS from well outside GEO is questionable at best. Apparently, recovery of the Hubble for placement in the Smithsonian is not possible, so I wanted to put an alternative idea out for discussion. Recovery of Hubble remains technically possible, but NASA has ground-ruled it out for safety reasons. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Urged to Reconsider Hubble Decision | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 116 | April 2nd 04 07:14 PM |
Hubble Servicing Mission 4 cancelled? | Richard Schumacher | Space Shuttle | 10 | January 26th 04 10:13 AM |
Hubble. Alive and Well | VTrade | Space Shuttle | 12 | January 21st 04 05:57 AM |
The Death of Hubble...When Will it Come? | MasterShrink | Space Shuttle | 7 | January 21st 04 05:49 AM |
The Hubble Space Telescope... | Craig Fink | Space Shuttle | 118 | December 6th 03 04:41 PM |