Hubble. Alive and Well

"starman" wrote in message
...

If the US abandons Hubble can another country claim the salvage rights
to it? Maybe this is why the US would rather deorbit it than place it in
a higher orbit for safe keeping.

No. There's really no concept of salvage rights in space since there's
really no way to abandon something (legally) in space.



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"Greg D. Moore \" ) writes:
"starman" wrote in message
...

If the US abandons Hubble can another country claim the salvage rights
to it? Maybe this is why the US would rather deorbit it than place it in
a higher orbit for safe keeping.

No. There's really no concept of salvage rights in space since there's
really no way to abandon something (legally) in space.

Besides, no one else has a vehicle that can take aboard something the
size of the HST, and return it to the ground...

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.

"Greg D. Moore (Strider)" wrote:

"starman" wrote in message
...

If the US abandons Hubble can another country claim the salvage rights
to it? Maybe this is why the US would rather deorbit it than place it in
a higher orbit for safe keeping.

No. There's really no concept of salvage rights in space since there's
really no way to abandon something (legally) in space.

The more you think about it, space law can get really tricky. For
example, if another country had the ability to service Hubble and wanted
to use it after the US was committed to shutting it down, would that
country have to get permission from the US for this use? If that country
did need permission but appropriated the use of Hubble without
permission, what could the US do? Perhaps the best way to avoid these
situations is to deorbit it.

BTW- What is the best guess about how large a space telescope (mirror
size) the US military currently has in orbit? Has anyone from a company
like Perkin-Elmer ever talked about the mirrors they've made for Uncle
Sam?


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

starman wrote in :

"Greg D. Moore (Strider)" wrote:

"starman" wrote in message
...

If the US abandons Hubble can another country claim the salvage
rights to it? Maybe this is why the US would rather deorbit it than
place it in a higher orbit for safe keeping.

No. There's really no concept of salvage rights in space since
there's really no way to abandon something (legally) in space.

The more you think about it, space law can get really tricky. For
example, if another country had the ability to service Hubble and
wanted to use it after the US was committed to shutting it down, would
that country have to get permission from the US for this use?

Yes, absolutely they do, under Article 8 of the Outer Space Treaty of 1967.

If that
country did need permission but appropriated the use of Hubble without
permission, what could the US do?

The US could seize assets, freeze bank accounts, impose limited trade
sanctions... there are lots of options. And you don't have to go very far
back in history to find examples, either.

--
JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.