![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil wrote in message ...
Gerry Aitken© wrote: When I pressed the button on my canon 10x30is bino's I said, "Wow, wow, wow!". I still say wow at least once everytime I use them! How do those work for astronomy? I read a somewhat negative review of the 15x50IS model -- which was a big surprise. Is 30 mm enough for real "wow" on DSOs? Phil I picked up a pair of the 10x30 Canon IS earlier this year. Under dark skies there is a very definite "wow!" factor. It can only be enhanced with the 15 and 18x 50's. The reason these all work so well is that they can be successfully handheld. I've read comments stating that because of the stability, the 10x30's are comparable to what they show to a pair of handheld 10x50's. For any binoculars, the wow factor is based on the stability of how they're held. I like the Canons because they don't need to be mounted. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Greene wrote: The reason these all work so well is that they can be successfully handheld. I've read comments stating that because of the stability, the 10x30's are comparable to what they show to a pair of handheld 10x50's. For any binoculars, the wow factor is based on the stability of how they're held. I like the Canons because they don't need to be mounted. Definitely a plus. Phil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hubble Hobbles & The Fear Factor | Kent Betts | Space Shuttle | 4 | February 20th 04 01:45 PM |
The sleep factor | Tdcarls | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | September 29th 03 02:23 AM |
Clinton administration a contributing factor to loss of Columbia? | Mutts | Space Shuttle | 10 | September 2nd 03 01:44 AM |
The Collins factor | Doug... | History | 27 | August 22nd 03 05:57 PM |
W. Ferris article in Sky and Telescope August 2003 article on ODM | PrisNo6 | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | August 11th 03 08:02 PM |