![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar/16/2021 at 14:17, JF Mezei wrote :
On 2021-03-12 10:36, Alain Fournier wrote: Mars' orbit. You just need to time your departure so you arrive at aphelion when Mars happens to be at that same spot. Thanks. I hadn't considred elliptical orbit around the sun. So if you time departure from earth timed so your high point is close enough to be grabbed by Mars, how do you not get grabbed by Mars if you need to abort landing and return to Earth? Fire retrograde so you let Mars move ahead and you drop altitude above sun? Fire towards the sun to reduce the fancy name for apogee so you don't get high enough to get grabbed by Mars? Mars will not gravitationally "grab" you. If you want to land on Mars, you need to slow down deep in Mars' gravity well, either by firing rockets or more likely by hitting the Martian atmosphere. You will need to make a trajectory correction when you get near Mars. Either you correct the trajectory to hit Mars' atmosphere at a quite precise angle, or you correct the trajectory to not hit the atmosphere and return to Earth (see below). If you don't abort and go for a Mars landing, you have to hit the atmosphere steep enough so you don't just go through and continue away from Mars and shallow enough so you don't burn in the atmosphere or don't do a "lithobreaking" (lithobreaking means to stop by hitting rocks, in other words a crash). And more importantly, if you timed departure from Earth so Mars ends up being in the right location to grab you and you abort that and continue on your elliptical orbit, will Earth be there to grab you when you reach the fancy word for perigee? While you were traveling "up" to Mars, wouldn't Earth have sped up relative to you and be much further ahead by the time you drop back down to fancy for perigee? Or is it a case that for such long durations, the Earth may have circled back and be just behind you? No Earth will not have circled back, that would be too long. I have explained this in my previous post. If instead of having aphelion near Mars you give a little stronger push when leaving Earth and have a theoretical aphelion at just the right distance from the Sun, somewhere in the asteroid belt, then if you chose that aphelion just right, you will have on average the same angular speed as Earth around the Sun on the Earth to Mars leg of your trip. But if you timed your departure just right, you won't reach that aphelion because Mars will be on your path. Once again, when close to Mars you have a decision to make, do you adjust your trajectory to hit the atmosphere at just the right place to land safely. Or do you do another fine adjustment to not hit the atmosphere but instead to have Mars' gravity bend your trajectory just right to send you back to Earth. If you had the same angular speed as Earth on your way to Mars, after having Mars bending your trajectory, you will have the same speed as on the way to Mars and you will be on a solar orbit similar to the one you had going to Mars. Only instead of being on the part of the orbit moving away from the Sun, you will be on the part of the orbit moving closer to the Sun. And on that leg of the trip you will still have the same average angular speed as Earth around the Sun, and therefore will get back to Earth. Note that if you had not encountered Mars, as you would have went nearer to aphelion your orbital speed would have slowed down and you would then slip behind Earth, with no chance of getting back to Earth for many years. If all you want to do on Mars is to plant the Canadian flag and come back, the trip with the Hohmann transfer orbits takes you 26 months. But the minute you get grabbed by Mars and land, isn't your orbit around the sun circularized, and a return to Earth requires megafuel because you have to recreate that elliptical orbit from scratch? Yes. If you land on Mars you can't have a free return. Alain Fournier |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The 2016 Spacex Mars Colonization plan has been published online | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | June 15th 17 05:26 PM |
Space colonization essay ! | TheBeerjunkie | Astronomy Misc | 26 | December 23rd 11 05:31 AM |
Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus | G. L. Bradford | Policy | 191 | June 3rd 06 12:56 AM |
Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus | Mike Combs | Policy | 12 | April 28th 06 08:25 PM |
Mars Colonization | Remy Villeneuve | Policy | 36 | January 3rd 04 12:07 AM |