A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Who/What Killed Physics?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 8th 21, 11:03 PM posted to sci.astro
AndreK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Who/What Killed Physics?

On 05.12.2020 14:52, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Peter Woit: "...as seems increasingly all too possible, we're now at an endpoint of fundamental physics..." http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=9444

Dead physics means dead civilization. Woit blames string theory but actually physics was killed by the metastases of Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light nonsense.

Peter Woit: "There's a very real danger...that we will in our lifetimes see the end of fundamental physics as a human endeavor" http://math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=8392

Sabine Hossenfelder: "Looks like Chris Anderson was right when he proclaimed the end of theory." https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=11961

Peter Woit: "This all of a sudden made things clear: what is going on is "theatrical physics", not "theoretical physics"." http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=9691

Neil Turok: "The extensions of the standard model, like grand unified theories, they were supposed to simplify it. But in fact they made it more complicated. The number of parameters in the standard model is about 18. The number in grand unified theories is typically 100. In super-symmetric theories, the minimum is 120. And as you may have heard, string theory seems to predict 10 to the power of 1,000 different possible laws of physics. It’s called the multiverse. It’s the ultimate catastrophe: that theoretical physics has led to this crazy situation where the physicists are utterly confused and seem not to have any predictions at all." https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ott...odern-physics/

Peter Woit: "As far as this stuff goes, we're now not only at John Horgan's "End of Science", but gone past it already and deep into something different." http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=7266

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev



The quotations are out of context. If you read the full text of Peter
Woit for example, he does not mean that the physics is dead or even
should be replaced by something else.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Einstein Killed Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 23rd 20 06:30 PM
How Einstein Killed Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 June 13th 19 09:12 AM
How Einstein Killed Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 November 24th 18 08:53 AM
Who Killed Physics? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 July 27th 17 08:05 PM
EINSTEIN'S LIE THAT KILLED PHYSICS Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 June 15th 15 09:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.