![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JF Mezei writes:
On 2021-01-25 10:48, David Spain wrote: On 1/25/2021 10:42 AM, David Spain wrote: I've neglected Super Heavy, but I could imagine a separate ring for it, switched to merge with the Starship ring at the pads. A crane at the pad is used to lift Starship atop SuperHeavy? Realistically, how often would Starship take off by itself from Earth? Wouldn't all launches be of a Starship atop super heavy? Yes I believe so, well except maybe for trans-continental p2p flights, if sonic boom ordinances are changed to allow it. Fat chance I suppose. But given majority flights with Super Heavy, it's still no big deal, see above. A sub-ring of rail tracks allows contruction/re-furbishment of Super Heavy and maybe assembly with a Starship in one of the final Service Bays before pad arrival, or maybe stacking at the pad. It does appear now that the launch platform for SuperHeavy/Starship will also serve as the primary recovery mechanism for SuperHeavy return. Which means another recovery platform (mobile or otherwise, as in sea based) will likely be used for landing Starship upon return, possibly just a flat deck. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chinese Say They're Building 'Impossible' Space Drive | [email protected] | Policy | 8 | October 2nd 08 11:36 PM |
Time to start building space elevator or die | Policy | 12 | July 5th 05 06:59 PM | |
Getting help with building/testing space access engineering | David Summers | Technology | 2 | April 11th 05 12:20 AM |
Possible space elevator building material? | Brent Anderson | History | 3 | March 13th 04 07:08 PM |
Building Ships IN SPACE | Aus-LEO | Policy | 1 | January 17th 04 08:56 PM |