PNN e commerce updates

On Saturday 24 October 2020 11:07:04 UTC + 2, Doctor Who wrote:
On 10/24/20 9:10 AM, Marco C. wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:39:37 +0200, pcf anxiagorod
wrote:

human imbecility is seen when you cling to it
laws of physics old, very old and trite and trite. IS'
now that physics evolves, cutting the past.

Only in this way will it be possible to implement the revolution that is already in
act.

It would be enough a little little thing called 'test',
look are five simple letters. Yet you and your boss won't
totally ignore the meaning.
the theoretical and experimental test comes only after you have certified (even temporally) who said and tried certain tests you blab for "bull****" regardless .... but I'm sure you don't understand why IT DOES NOT COVER YOUR FACE FROM ASS … ..
you want not only aggratis the know-how of the pnn but also done so that it can be robbed through a peer review stamp ..... but you will not understand this too :-)

Ah, yes, of course the proof will come and it will be great to see us
roll everyone in the drool, etcetera etcetera, here for now
did not happen (and never will, so what good is it
repeat it ..............) then do an examination of
consciousness .....
but do it you who NEVER OBJECTIVELY examine what others say in favor of the violability of Newton's III (Pastore and Fabri) in www.asps.it/pnndatabase..htm ... How many thousands of times have I told you?
Zero outcome .... continue to leave out the thing .... because you have always triggered against the pnn.
The lekkaculo skizzy answered by chance to this one by E. Fabri: http://www..sagredo.eu/varie/terzopr-em.pdf
His words! "In order to demonstrate that in the e.m. field the third principle of dynamics
not valid, the following situation is considered "….

I repeat it is not convenient for the defamatory purposes of the PNN

and let's move on to the other blind cazzaro

and they should know more about electrodynamics and electromagnetism
of Maxwell, in addition to the use of the F. of Lorentz, especially if one is
only cazzari whistle therapists without knowing **** about physics and
history of science,
coincidentally, the PNN is based precisely on historical pieces of forgotten historical electrodynamics :-) so it really takes a nice face as an incompetent kulo to attribute to PNN what is typically due to the approximation and carelessness of your donkeys ....
Forget your Maxwell himself complained that no investigations had been made on the interactions between open circuits (everything is reported on Nova Astronautica ABOUT 20 YEARS AGO !!!!) and I told it again to those idiots of Nasaspaceflight before they banned me ….
Have you investigated? ... but I miss the kazzo! MISSING FOR THE KAZZO !!! .... and I can not tell you that in the light of F432 GRAZIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Why did you forget…. Why do you always go after salutary and reverent stamps and badges and what necessarily must be presented well :-) ……. MAYBE TO PRESENT 4 limiting kazzas based on classical electrodynamics WELL DO NOT INVESTIGATE ANY OTHER POSSIBILITIES? :-)

because "the old laws of physics" are
serve, serve and will serve again
Undoubted DOUBT! but the problem is another deeper one: ARE YOU SURE THAT ONLY WHAT HAS BEEN DONE WITH CLASSICAL ELECTRODYNAMICS COULD BE DONE?
Or are you sure you know how to best use classical electrodynamics?

even if they are all
approximations of larger laws that contain them.
Instead of investigating the basics by flying low, take flight only with the 4 limiting kazzas of classical electrodynamics ..... THEN formulating imperial and sumptuous laws ignoring the basis from which everything comes: "the greatest laws that contain them" have the flaw of be linked to the home base….
IF THE STARTING BASE IS NOT ONLY THAT, the laws from older become MORE GLANDI! :-)

In some evolutionary aspects of PNN I should say THANK YOU idiots to the gotha

and lallo