![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" writes:
It's all a matter of proper semantics in characterising the phenomena. I feel merger is more appropriate for galaxies and collision for billiard balls. Gravitational interactions and material contact are vastly different. Call them what you will so long as you understand what is happening. I think collision is misleading for galaxies since nothing is actually colliding in the common sense of the term. Of course, this assumes every galactic gravitational interaction leads to merger. In a thought experiment, two galaxies are on a collision course with two different velocities. Their centers of mass or gravitation may be sufficiently distant such that they won't merge. A barred spiral arm collides with a spiral arm of the other galaxy. It'd still be a collision since the result would never yield two completely intact and unchanged galaxies. They would have survived a galactic collision and travel along their merry way. -- Daniel Visit me at: gopher://gcpp.world |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Milky Way & Andromeda Merger | Bast[_2_] | Misc | 8 | September 15th 20 10:45 AM |
Milky Way & Andromeda Merger | Daniel[_14_] | Misc | 0 | September 14th 20 08:38 AM |
Milky Way & Andromeda Merger | Daniel[_14_] | Misc | 5 | September 13th 20 12:54 PM |