Einsteinians Abuse Special Relativity

It follows from Einstein's 1905 postulates that time SPEEDS UP for the traveler (SYMMETRIC time dilation): as the traveler checks stationary clocks against spaceship's clocks, he finds that stationary clocks are slow and spaceship's clocks are FAST, which means that he sees himself aging FASTER than stationary people.

Some (very few) Einsteinians obey logic and do teach the correct deduction:

David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow..." http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf

"The situation is that a man sets off in a rocket travelling at high speed away from Earth, whilst his twin brother stays on Earth. [...] ...the twin in the spaceship considers himself to be the stationary twin, and therefore as he looks back towards Earth he sees his brother ageing more slowly than himself." http://topquark.hubpages.com/hub/Twin-Paradox

High priests in the Einstein cult almost universally teach that time SLOWS DOWN for the traveler (ASYMMETRIC time dilation), which is non sequitur of course:

https://youtu.be/Q1y3YnPgaY4?t=1157

Albert Einstein 1911: "The clock runs slower if it is in uniform motion..." http://einsteinpapers.press.princeto...vol3-trans/368

Richard Feynman: "Now if all moving clocks run slower, if no way of measuring time gives anything but a slower rate, we shall just have to say, in a certain sense, that time itself appears to be slower in a space ship." http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html

Brian Greene: "If you're moving relative to somebody else, time for you slows down." https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE

Neil deGrasse Tyson: "...Einstein's special theory of relativity, which gives the precise prescription for how time would slow down for you if you are set into motion." http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ry?id=32191481

Why do high priests abuse special relativity and teach asymmetric time dilation (which does not follow from Einstein's 1905 postulates)? Because symmetric time dilation doesn't, but asymmetric time dilation does imply time travel into the future - the miracle (idiocy) that converted Einstein into a deity:

Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")." http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf

https://www.nbi.ku.dk/spoerg_om_fysi...ngeparadox.gif

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Asymmetric time dilation (moving clock is slow, stationary clock is fast) is an obvious non sequitur (doesn't follow from Einstein's 1905 postulates) but Einstein "derived" it in 1905 because it produced a quantitative (and breathtaking) prediction:

Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B." http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

Symmetric time dilation (either clock is slow as judged from the other clock's system) is a valid deduction from Einstein's 1905 postulates but is sterile - no prediction at all. If Einstein had obeyed logic and deduced symmetric time dilation in 1905, special relativity would never have been accepted.

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Jim Al-Khalili: "Einstein showed that for anything (or anyone) travelling at speeds approaching that of light...time literally runs more slowly." https://scienceinschool.org/2009/issue11/timetravel

Jim Al-Khalili could have said:

"For anything (or anyone) travelling at speeds approaching that of light...time literally runs FASTER."

This is an idiocy again (Einstein's relative tome is idiotic in all its aspects) but at least Jim Al-Khalili would be logically correct - "FASTER" is the valid deduction from Einstein's 1905 postulates.

Jim Al-Khalili could also have said:

"Time is independent of the speed of the traveller."

This is the truth, but "Jim Al-Khalili" and "truth" are difficult to combine together.

See mo https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev