Einstein's Relativity: Immeasurably More Preposterous than Flat-Earth Myths

Given the formula

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength),

Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light axiom implies that ANY frequency shift entails (is caused by) an inversely proportional wavelength shift. In particular, the motion of the observer (receiver) must idiotically change the wavelength of the incoming light (or the distance between light pulses) - otherwise the speed of light is not constant:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

Sometimes Einsteinians extend the idiocy beyond light - here it is applied to sound waves:

https://bretagnemontagne.files.wordp...2011/02/23.jpg

If there is a next, Einstein-free version of fundamental physics, Einstein's 1905 nonsensical axiom

"The speed of light is constant"

will be replaced with the easily justifiable axiom

"For a given emitter, the wavelength of light is constant".

I have developed the idea in a series of tweets he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Einstein's constant speed of light is just as obviously nonsensical as Big Brother's 2+2=5. Initially physicists accepted it because they were all etherists and Einstein had "borrowed" it from the ether theory. Then the ether was officially abandoned but physics had become an insane ideology and anything was acceptable:

George Orwell: "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?"

John Stachel: Einstein's constant speed of light "seems to be nonsense":

"But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair." http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/...relativity.htm

The constant speed of light is OBVIOUS NONSENSE. The reason why the frequency increases for the moving observer

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

is because the speed of the light pulses relative to him increases. No other reason exists. Einsteinians clearly see that the frequency and the speed of the pulses vary proportionally for the moving observer, but believe that only the frequency varies - the speed of the pulses gloriously remains constant. Ignatius of Loyola explains:

Ignatius of Loyola: "We should always be prepared so as never to err to believe that what I see as white is black, if the hierarchical Church defines it thus."

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev